I know that at least one 3d printer manufacturer is printing parts of its printers. But I don't think they deliver half a printer and expect you to print the rest out yourself.
But they are working on printing metal, electronics etc so perhaps one day!
Machine learning techniques would certainly find patterns in data that humans wouldn't but care needs to be taken that they are not superficial features of the data or collection devices. But the big issue is availability of large volumes of data. Here there is work on things like nano sensors...
I was a bit confused about this because you seem to have 5 responders and 5 non responders. I assume you did a regression calculation to generate a hyperplane that separates the two groups and this gives the equation you quote and hence the ROC curve.
However, its normal to use different data...
There isn't really any evidence to point to in these areas. Without a good understanding of mechanisms its just clustering of reported symptoms and people making guesses over what is important/different.
Its fair to consider them in the guideline scope which I assume says they can look for evidence and give advice on that. I suspect they will find very little evidence but if they do look at what causes deterioration they they may find some evidence for too much activity (or anecdotal evidence...
I think things like Vitamin D should be looked at for all house bound patients as should other vitamins where people struggle with diet. When my daughter was struggling to eat a dietitian was helpful in terms of supplements as well as general advice.
I get the impression there is no real evidence base. I've seen PACE results be quoted by them (but without attribution). I think they do claim an evidence base but never seem to point to anything anyone would think was reliable but rather they seem to believe that if they chant 'evidence based...
I think there is an important point here that I suspect comes from how multidisciplinary teams work in the NHS. To me you need different specialist to do the stuff they do. For example the OTs to look at home adaptations to help with disability. So to include them(and social workers etc) I would...
Congratulations @Simon M at getting yourself a PhD student.
This could be a really good example of including patients in research work also good from a perspective of getting someone in research to understand what ME really is which I always feel can feed back into better research.
I would ask him to comment on why as measures get more objective they show a smaller change with CBT and GET with the biggest change based on CFQ and least we believe with the step test.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.