Try this link instead (if you don't want to give them the hits): http://web.archive.org/web/http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-study-investigating-a-potential-biomarker-for-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-me/
From Reuters. The second part seems irrelevant to me. Even if it's measuring a consequence of the illness, rather than its cause, it can still be a biomarker?
ETA: It's SW commenting.
More news:
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-04-biomarker-chronic-fatigue-syndrome.amp
By Miriam E. Tucker: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/912336
With lots of quotes from experts: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/amp/Stanford-discovery-validates-chronic-fatigue-13804385.php
Over in...
The ones I sent above were helpful but it made the testing centre focus only on VO2max. It was actually my heart rate that dropped on the second day (it wouldn't reach the same level as the day before). Ideally, you're looking for drops of more than 12% in any one measure, I think.
ETA: I...
This study supposedly claims that patients are more likely to be white, although I can't see that in the abstract: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12562565
It's one of the references here: https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/38/6/1554/668115
With all due respect, this isn't an 'invented problem' (and the issue goes beyond stock images). I'm in the #MEAction Black Forum group on Facebook and people have raised some very specific instances where race and ethnicity have been major barriers for them both inside and outside the ME...
I intentionally didn't reply to anyone in particular. I meant 'you' in the open sense, rather than specifically in response to one person. 'One' would have been clearer, but perhaps more pretentious.
As for whether we should bring politics into the ME community... It's unrealistic to expect no...
Personally, I have no problem with it. It's his individual perspective, and I do see many men who struggle with things on their own because they're encouraged to toughen up and not talk about things.
It might not be your experience described in the article, but it doesn't invalidate his...
I'm not sure if that's something NICE would consider relevant. The scope, as published, doesn't really consider categorisation or coding. It's about treatment and diagnosis.
Oh, this is just how the awards work. I know a few people who've won or been nominated. Think of it as voting to shortlist, rather than voting to win outright.
The public can nominate literally anyone, so they balance that out by requiring people to vote for nominees. That way, only people with...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.