My personal feeling is that this has been surreptitiously fostered by one of the most powerful forces there is - the political determination to cut financial costs, no matter what the human costs.
Which makes the massive assumption people can (and can be bothered to) distinguish genuine benefit cheats from people genuinely disabled but trying to live their lives nonetheless.
Nor had I, but somehow it doesn't amaze me ... nor you I'm sure. I find it very hard to believe the motivation has much to do with the Hippocratic oath.
Essentially arguing for objectivity and accuracy, which are the very things SW always seems so averse to. The cynic in me says that knighthoods and honours are likely to be much more forthcoming when puppeteers can see money being saved, than would ever be the case from merely being ethical and...
In due course it would be good for PACE to be used as a clear example not just of appalling research, but also to exemplify the very real dangers of presuming as-yet-unexplained-by-medical-science symptoms to be psychological by default.
My wife's ME began after contracting a virus whilst recovering from a thyroid operation. n=1 obviously doesn't count for much, but definitely of interest.
Some crossed wires on my part I would think then, from this post:
https://www.s4me.info/threads/gary-burgess-talking-me-cfs-bbc-radio-5-live-wed-1pm.2635/#post-48372
And importantly, for me there was not going to be a problem if there was a connection, just an opportunity for more debate.
Nonetheless his high profile endorsement is a major plus. Pure political power may not come with his advocacy, but his presence alone could help bring others round.
Agreed. All that counts is effective communication; if it's ineffective it's a total waste of time and effort. I think of communication as a transmitter sending information to a receiver, and the receiver getting from the information what the transmitter intended. To me, communication is only...
I don't have access to the full article, and might not get the answer to my question even if I did.
Can anyone tell me, without too much scientific complexity, how this study discriminated between sub-optimal effort due to physical effects, versus sub-optimal effort due to psychological...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.