Search results

You can watch her talk here: https://tedxbristol.com/ (1.23) And now we've got appropriate smilies. :wtf::banghead::mad::nailbiting::facepalm::confused::grumpy::cry::jawdrop::sick::yuck::dead:

Coyne article on the same topic: At least 3 reasons you don’t have to read Understanding Psychosis and Schizophrenia 2 https://jcoynester.wordpress.com/2017/11/01/at-least-3-reasons-you-dont-have-to-read-understanding-psychosis-and-schizophrenia-2/

From Stuart Murdoch, singer of Belle and Sebastian, ME sufferer:

Olaug S. Lian & Catherine Robson International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17482631.2017.1392219

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/turning-straw-gold/201710/how-respond-unkind-remarks-when-you-re-chronically-ill Edit: if this link doesn't work, try this one: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/turning-straw-gold

Small cohort and poor criteria. Does that mean anything?

Article critic of a BPS (British Psychology Society) controversial report on psychosis. There are familiar flaws: incomplete definition, wilful ignorance of biological causes, bad questionnaires, "inadequate provision of psychological therapies"...

Unrest can be seen everywhere from now on. Subtitles: English, Spanish (Spain and Latin America), German, French, Dutch, Danish https://www.unrest.film/digital So great, I'm going to watch it with my family today!

Esther Crawley claims harassment, university has no record By Adam Lowe http://vadamagazine.com/news/esther-crawley-claims-harassment-university-no-record

James E. Clark, Sean L. Davidson, Laura Maclachlan, Julia L. Newton & Stuart Watson MEA just published a summary review of this article we previously discussed: http://www.meassociation.org.uk/2017/10/mea-summary-review-rethinking-childhood-adversity-in-mecfs-30-october-2017/ Reminder...

https://forbetterscience.com/2017/10/30/swedish-central-ethics-review-board-finds-macchiarini-guilty-of-misconduct-requests-retraction-of-6-papers/ Reminder: 2 of the 6 articles were published in The Lancet (who published The PACE trial main paper)

Because the fake one was more dramatic visually?

English language AFAIK - As far as I know AFAIR - As far as I remember ASAP - As soon as possible ATM - At the moment BTW – By the way ETA - Edited to add FFS - For f*'s sake FTFY - Fixed that for you FWIW - For what it's worth FYI - For your information GBP - British pound IANAL - I am not a...

Falk Leichsenring, DSc and Christiane Steinert, PhD The authors hightlight several problematic points: - Limited Study Quality - Weak Empirical Tests - Uncontrolled Researcher Allegiance - Central Mechanisms of Change Not Corroborated - Limited Efficacy - No Clear Evidence of Superior Efficacy...

Quite my impression, some parts are ambiguous; there are paragraphs about the stress hypothesis, for example that do not match with other biomedical researches talked about. But, yes, still progress!

More on GET And CBT (Bold and paragraph breaks are mine).

RIP Oxford criteria

Other extracts: