Search results

This sums it up for me. My earlier comment on the thread was not shamed just fuming I’m remembering particularly the way I was dealt with by GPs when I was trying to understand what was wrong, what illness I had, the laughing and eye rolling when I said a friend with Fibromyalgia had suggested...

Rebrand of the month

Oh good

I think it’s the sending to surgeries that hasn’t been completed

Although to be fair in my experience vaccinations for flu and Covid were done in well ventilated places

Is this the only study that has looked at gait as an issue.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62183714 Now announced all over 50s in uk to be eligible for Covid booster

First paragraph of background quotes “PPS” as 20% of gp consultations and 52% of specialist referrals @dave30th bete noir of Bermingham also quoted

:eek:

“Back of a cigarette pack journal”

I assumed not and I think the ‘researchers’ will assume that nobody will bother to check on them so won’t hold back from coming up with their own interpretations of,or excuses why they weren’t able to meet, the requirements.

Can see it coming a mile off oh the reviewers don’t want to be named or their review published because of those people with ME and their friends “maliciously” pointing out “completely inadvertent” :whistle: omissions and errors

And will the NEM be auditing compliance with their requirements?

Spot on @CRG

Love the Tour de France one Helly. :thumbup:

“Gold standard reviewing”

Disgusting

Stanford, California Neurology department

What world do these people live in where naming a questionnaire “acceptance” of a debilitating symptom like pain or chronic fatigue seems appropriate :banghead:

Thank you @shak8 maybe the researchers don’t realise that with @dave30th connection to Virology blog website their discussions might reach a wider audience. Perhaps they wouldn’t have been flippant if they realised.