No they’re not because in their eminent opinions the emperor really is wearing a marvellous suit of new clothes, and if they keep insisting us plebs might believe them
Struck me that a change to the title would improve the accuracy of this piece
Care for people with CFS/ME - based on evidence which is low/very low quality
Clinical assessment = filling in their BS questionnaires and having an appointment with a physio or ot where you basically go over the questionnaire again
Well done to the author. I get that it is an academic piece and the language is pitched at their academic tutors for the purpose of getting a PhD this isn’t a criticism of the individual but my reaction is always why can’t these groups use straightforward language.
Agreed. Before this i would have said they could have tested the reaction to a prospective patron by having an article about their involvement in the ME community in the magazine and seeing how people responded. Given the issues this time I think they probably do need a more formal approach to...
I spotted that the petition has gone over 22,000 been very slow recently but still the biggest number on a U.K. ME petition I think. https://www.change.org/p/the-national-institute-for-health-and-care-excellence-publish-the-nice-me-cfs-guideline-now
Agree strongly with this. I’m hoping she will pursue this.
I posted here about her intervention and the impact on DHSc https://www.s4me.info/threads/house-of-lords-govt-discussions-with-nice-on-me-cfs-main-chamber-tuesday-12-october-2021.22424/page-2#post-380744
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.