Search results

If we ever get a clear biomarker profile for ME, I think it quite likely it will be a much more common problem than we currently believe. Good point.

Done. :thumbsup:

Our objective is to spread valuable information and provide key tools to improve human relationships and thus promote both individual and collective well-being. The Devil is in the details.

Should be banned outright. A core condition of formal peer-reviewed publication must be that the data is made permanently available to the public (with appropriate anonymity safeguards). The cost of doing so is trivial these days. No excuses. IIRC, PACE has a compulsory data retention period of...

Who wants to predict the findings of this study?

We must do something. This is something. Let's do this thing.

I hope you are right. I agree that we certainly have made major critical gains in recent years, and momentum is with us of late. But any celebration is a little premature. The BPS club is not going down without the most ferocious of fights to cling onto their ill-gotten power and glory and income.

physiosomatic symptoms (formerly named psychosomatic) So is this just a rebrand? Or is it a genuine attempt to move away from the psychogenic presumption?

Congrats. :)

may + may ≠ does

Catastrophising is one of the most abused notions in psych.

SOS Same Old Shit

:speechless:

Interestingly, Wessely et al, and separately Bazelmans et al, showed in the mid-90s that hyperventilation is not an issue in ME (CFS). There was no association between level of functional impairment and degree of hyperventilation. There is only a weak association between hyperventilation and...

I don't recognise this group of people.

Yes, those very weak numbers are the best possible case scenario. Which is an appalling fact.

I can't shut mine up. :rolleyes:

These people should not be trusted with a wet tissue.

Oh boy. The empire building continues...

:):):)