I'm not arguing for restricted access. I'm saying that there needs to be another model in place. Saying we want everything to be free isn't a solution. Things don't pay for themselves.
How should peer reviewed be funded and organized? How should pusblishing be handled? These are questions that...
I know what open access means. I'm talking about the consequences of open access. Journals and peer review don't pay for themselves. I suppose universities could publish their own research on their websites, and we wouldn't need journals.
Abstract
A patient with severe postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) received immunotherapy with low-dose naltrexone (LDN) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and antibiotic therapy for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). A dramatic...
He does our job for us by tweeting the link. What will have the most impact; the article or his unintelligent commentary?
If there is data out there that invalidates your hypothesis, you'd better not call attention to it. That's 101.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.