I've started this thread for discussions regarding the methodological issues and efficacy of the IAPT treatment model.
In particular the move to treat 'CFS/ME' as a MUS that can be referred for IAPT CBT/GET treatment is now highly relevant to the ME/CFS NICE guideline.
Saw this linked to on Facebook.
Full paper available at https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/23f4ba_ae3ffbf6ff614c669f1e6ad9420a2dc9.pdf
I'm puzzled about where this was actually published. In the document linked to above it says
On what appears to be the website of the Journal of Biological...
A general piece, that doesn't mention PACE (although Stark was one of the statisticians involved in the re-analysis of PACE data): https://theconversation.com/sciences-credibility-crisis-why-it-will-get-worse-before-it-can-get-better-86865
I thought that this was an interesting summary of some...
This isn't particularly relevant to us, but is short (less than two pages), and I found it interesting for helping to understand the medical culture around trials/evidence when PACE came out a bit more. Sounds bad tbh.
http://sci-hub.cc/10.1001/jama.2011.1960
"IDEALLY,GOOD MEDICAL PRACTICES...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.