Apparently ME/CFS was barely mentioned
Finally, comparative studies that can examine differences and similarities in the biology and clinical features of long COVID and other infection associated illnesses (for example, ‘long flu’ following influenza infection, and myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome) are also urgently needed.
I agree with your interpretation. I think that probably has a lot do with the patients he is looking at and the type of research he is doing. His research is methodologically very strong, but he seems only focused on using the US Department of Veterans Affairs database (quite naturally since that is where he is employed) so it’s very much 60+ year olds and predominantly males (sometimes as much as 90% males). As such his research centers around older folks with many comorbidities with often severe acute infections, so essentially the cohort that is very similar to the hospitalised/organ damage/acute damage/stroke/PICS cohort. This probably tells us nothing about other cohorts like the predominantly younger and female cohort that suffers from a ME-like LC or the neurocognitive phenotype.It sounds as if he thinks of LC as a different (and new) disease, with a scope wider than the ME/CFS phenotype, eg stroke, diabetes. While encouraging prevention of LC via avoiding Covid, he does emphasise that Long Covid didn't exist before 2020. Though he does talk about the problems with terminology and definitions: LC, PASC, PCC etc.
Ziyad Al-Aly is a strong and outspoken advocate for LC with many well-cited papers on LC that have been discussed on this forum.
I agree with your interpretation. I think that probably has a lot do with the patients he is looking at and the type of research he is doing. His research is methodologically very strong, but he seems only focused on using the US Department of Veterans Affairs database (quite naturally since that is where he is employed) so it’s very much 60+ year olds and predominantly males (sometimes as much as 90% males). As such his research centers around older folks with many comorbidities with often severe acute infections, so essentially the cohort that is very similar to the hospitalised/organ damage/acute damage/stroke/PICS cohort. This probably tells us nothing about other cohorts like the predominantly younger and female cohort that suffers from a ME-like LC or the neurocognitive phenotype.
With all the different talks about LC and phenotypes it can be quite frustrating when not even researchers seem to understand how important the choice of cohorts and phenotypes is. Even more frustrating when 4 years in the leading researchers still have to discuss the basic problems in nomenclature that are still ever present. Coming up with solid definitions is not that hard...