When I knew I was going to be admitted to the Brompton a few years ago for heart tests over several days, it was very helpful to have a letter from Dr Bansal for the heart Consultant explaining how to ensure the illness was not made worse by the investigations.
He wrote a letter about two thirds of a side long, advising spreading out tests so that I had rests in between for recovery, that physio should be not be too pressured, I can't remember more, but I was very glad to have it when on coming round from anaesthesia, I was asked to immediately do an additional test, a stress echo. They were perplexed when I refused but in the context of the letter explaining that testing should be spread out, it was understood and was arranged for me to come back to complete that test which I did. I had no ill effects from the testing.
A useful document.
I'm surprised that patients are being sent into hospital clutching such lengthy documents.All trusts now have a version of an autism passport e.g. here's one
I wonder if the ideal would be a document that provided a menu of simple statements, such as, 'I have orthostatic intolerance, a form of dysautonomia, that means I need to lie flat for most of the time and become much more ill if I don't', where people could delete the ones that don't apply and that would boil down to the 2/3 page that @Jonathan Edwards is wisely aiming for. I think have well-prewritten options would be a huge help.It just seems so antiquated to do this through massive overwhelming documents surely there are people with the skills to use an online form/questionnaire format where you work through questions and your responses are used to produce the output report tailored to you rather than 10 pages of irrelevant material.
@bobbler started a thread about this but I can't find itI wonder if the ideal would be a document that provided a menu of simple statements, such as, 'I have orthostatic intolerance, a form of dysautonomia, that means I need to lie flat for most of the time and become much more ill if I don't', where people could delete the ones that don't apply and that would boil down to the 2/3 page that @Jonathan Edwards is wisely aiming for. I think have well-prewritten options would be a huge help.
For NHS Scotland: Key Information Summary (KIS):
https://www.scimp.scot.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013-04-05-KIS-Patient-FAQs-v2.01.pdf
For NHS England there is the Reasonable Adjustments Digital Flag (RADF):
https://digital.nhs.uk/services/reasonable-adjustment-flag
"The Reasonable Adjustment Flag was developed in the NHS Spine to enable health and care workers to record, share and view details of reasonable adjustments across the NHS, wherever the person is treated."
Primary and secondary care is supposed to be identifying patients for whom reasonable adjustments and adaptations are appropriate in order that key adjustments can be added to the patient's NHS Spine record with the patient's consent.
But it is possible to ask your GP practice for key information to be added to the Spine and work with them on what information is included.
This is incredible. I've desperately needed this for decades and I've never heard of it. Has any PwME here heard of it and managed to get their issues recorded?"The Reasonable Adjustment Flag was developed in the NHS Spine to enable health and care workers to record, share and view details of reasonable adjustments across the NHS, wherever the person is treated."
@Kitty was it you who asked their GP to record something?This is incredible. I've desperately needed this for decades and I've never heard of it. Has any PwME here heard of it and managed to get their issues recorded?
...That said its not without risk, in terms of what is actually said within the flag, readers interpretations of it - what about when one wants to avoid the 'ME/CFS' stigma & not announce it etc. It may have pros & cons
I note that one poster in that thread has said:
If a diagnosis of ME/CFS has been recorded in the patient's Summary Care Record, that diagnosis will show in the Spine anyway unless the patient has not consented to the SCR being accessible to secondary care staff, pharmacists, paramedics etc or has asked for specific information to be omitted.
Our local hospitals don't have access to the full GP electronic medical record but do have access to the GP Summary Care Record which lists allergies, medications, lists of diagnoses etc. They also have access to blood test results ordered by GPs as these are processed by the hospital's labs.
In fact, at a recent appointment at the pre-procedure assessment clinic, the nurse noted that a diagnosis had not been recorded in the SCR although the medication prescribed for that condition had been listed and suggested that the GP practice was asked to add the condition to the Summary Care Record.
If you have access to your medical records via an online portal, phone app or NHS app, you may be able to view some or all of your Summary Care Record. In ours, we can only see allergies and current medications. It's worth asking for a printed copy of the most recent version of your SCR (they are apparently updated automatically following each clinical contact with the practice) to see what has and what has not been included (and also to ask for any errors to be corrected).
You can also ask for other information to be added to the SCR.
This is incredible. I've desperately needed this for decades and I've never heard of it. Has any PwME here heard of it and managed to get their issues recorded?
I am sure many of my dx's have not been added, when asking a nurse for adjustments to a pre-procedure process she said there was nothing on my record to say that I had the condition that the need resulted from.
But on my app I can see recent additions e.g. headache - significance: minor.
It appears to be the GP's free notes, there's a section for documents sent from other organisations, one for test results, allergies, medications.Is your app showing the SCR or the GP's "free" clinical notes?
My understanding is that extraction of information from GP clinical notes for inclusion in the SCR is done electronically and it does appear to be a bit hit and miss with what gets picked up for inclusion in the SCR.
I haven't seen a copy of my own SCR for some years now, when I was given a print out to take to an appointment at an emergency eye clinic. Diagnoses listed went back to 1980. Some information was wrong and I asked for that to be corrected.