BBC journalist has reached out asking for more info on ME patient abuse claims

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS news' started by Aaron, Jun 14, 2024.

  1. JemPD

    JemPD Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,187
    I recommend not saying that. As Prof W disputes it and says he was not involved.
    yes IIRC it says he was not involved.

    I'm not saying he was or wasnt, only that he says he wasnt & unless anyone has proof that he was, then.....
     
    bobbler, Hutan, Ariel and 12 others like this.
  2. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    412
    He still lives on the Isle of Man and works in IT, and photography. I don’t recall where I saw this, sorry. He fully recovered and I think he gets a fair amount of requests which he doesn’t take up.
    He’s easy to find on LinkedIn etc
    https://me-pedia.org/wiki/Ean_Proctor
     
    bobbler, MEMarge, sebaaa and 11 others like this.
  3. Aaron

    Aaron Established Member

    Messages:
    13
    MEMarge, Missense, alktipping and 6 others like this.
  4. JemPD

    JemPD Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,187
    Sorry Aaron i just not well enough to read/take in all that at the moment so i dont know.
    But unless it contains actual letters and reports showing his involvement, rather than quotes from them, then i'd have thought that legally, no its not evidence, it's Margaret's account of evidence.

    Thats only my opinion of course & I'm not saying i dont believe her, but i'm not the person who needs to be convinced.
    Nor, it must be said, am i in any way any authority on any of this.

    I dont want us to poison the well by over-egging the pudding, to mix metaphors. ITs bad enough that it happened, regardless of who did it, and plenty more recent examples, its just interesting to see that things havent moved on hardly at all in decades.
     
    Hutan, Ariel, EzzieD and 12 others like this.
  5. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    412
    In Ean’s MEpedia page there’s a good, sourced overview of S Wessely. Including M Williams.

    I agree the researcher doesn’t need to be “told” of his involvement, they can read more about it if that’s what they’re interested in doing.
     
    MEMarge, Missense, Solstice and 6 others like this.
  6. Robert 1973

    Robert 1973 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,352
    Location:
    UK
    Strongly agree. Remember too that Margaret Williams is a pseudonym. So unless it’s supported by reliable primary sources it is an anonymous account of evidence. Please tread with extreme caution.

    Edit: There will be people reading this who know Margaret Williams’s real identity. They may be able put the journalist in contact with him/her if you ask them to PM you.
     
    bobbler, Hutan, Ariel and 14 others like this.
  7. JohnTheJack

    JohnTheJack Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,509
    I have been skimming this document the last couple of days. The quotations are from official reports so I would download the reports (if possible) and any other sources used, check the quotations and if they stand up, send the Williams document and all the other sources.

    To be honest, I find much of it a bit thin.

    I also don't think this is a good case to use. It's now very old and a lot of the details are a bit murky (with lots of disputed nuances). To me, it actually weakens our case: This? Again? Is that the best you can do? Something from over 30 years ago? And why this obsession with that nice Sir Simon?

    I think the more recent cases, especially if we can show some sort of pattern of behaviour across different clinics, are much more powerful.

    I also think it's worth talking about a more general abuse of patients, one which is within their (now accepted as without convincing evidence to support it) model and in the epistemic injustice built on it.

    ETA: Yes, I agree with Rob.
     
    MEMarge, bobbler, Solstice and 14 others like this.
  8. Robert 1973

    Robert 1973 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,352
    Location:
    UK
    Exactly what John says. I think bringing this up again, at this time, would probably be counterproductive. But if the same journalist wanted to do a wider investigation about how we got to where we are, with patients (including Proctor) being institutionally mistreated based on an unevidenced, unscientific model which has subsequently been shown to be both wrong and harmful, that could be useful. SW is probably more responsible for that than anyone else, but there are many other culprits.
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2024
    MEMarge, bobbler, sebaaa and 13 others like this.
  9. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,488
    Location:
    Australia
    As best I can recall without checking, Wessely did not sign the actual sectioning papers for Ean, but he did submit an expert witness statement to the court supporting it.

    So he has some responsibility for the outcome.
     
  10. Lou B Lou

    Lou B Lou Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    548
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2024
  11. RainbowCloud

    RainbowCloud Established Member

    Messages:
    7
    Very best of luck speaking with the journalist, I’m bedbound 95% and I appreciate what you’re doing so much. Here’s a video from a whole back where Ean Procter is interviewed:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDeu_OlMivU




    Also here’s a website with lots of solid sources which I hope will be helpful:

    https://meandmeresources.wordpress.com/

    David Tuller’s virology blog is surely the most comprehensive account of the PACE trial - that’d be the best place (or with Tuller himself if poss) for the journalist to fact check Wessely’s precise involvement:

    https://virology.ws/david-tuller-posts/

    And lastly this by Byron Hyde (reported via Reddit):


    THANK YOU!!
    ps. Will you let us know what might happen next? I live in hope there will be a Panorama documentary about the PACE scandal one day, and that shows just how utterly horrific this illness can be.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2024
    Ariel, EndME, Hutan and 5 others like this.
  12. RainbowCloud

    RainbowCloud Established Member

    Messages:
    7
    Oh also…

    Info about the ME papers that were originally sealed for 75yrs (usually it’s 30 and 75 is apparently highly unusual):

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/...ics-wrong-deny-existence-chronic-fatigue.html

    https://meassociation.org.uk/2011/0...eld-in-the-national-archives-21-january-2011/

    https://retractionwatch.com/2016/08...controversial-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-study/

    Nigel Speight describes some more cases of ME patient neglect:
    https://meassociation.org.uk/2024/0...ents-with-very-severe-me-by-dr-nigel-speight/

    Link to another s4me thread the journalist may be interested in:
    https://www.s4me.info/threads/maeve-oneill.23420/page-3
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2024
    Ariel, EndME, Hutan and 4 others like this.
  13. RainbowCloud

    RainbowCloud Established Member

    Messages:
    7

Share This Page