Thank you
@ScottTriGuy. I think one reason we haven't switched off cfs, is that community members are worried that people won't know what we're talking about. Ironically, those outside the community don't know what cfs means anyways. They just think they know what it means: lazy, delusional, malingering, benefit scrounging, burnt out, overly busy, while some of us think we are conveying the name of an illness, something they will understand as a physical illness.
We aren't doing ourselves any favours. In my small sampling of how these things go, when I've said I have Myalgic Encephalomyelitis people seem interested etc. If I then "explain" that ME is also called CFS, they say "Oh", in that disinterested, tone of voice that tells me they think they know what I'm talking about. In these scenarios, what I haven't done is what I set out to do, which is explain ME to them. Well, that can take volumes, but there are some short cuts.
The sooner we get rid of the term cfs, the better. By using it to try and explain what the term ME means, we are denigrating the term ME, and the disease. As many have said, it's like calling lung cancer chronic coughing disease. Pair up lung cancer with chronic coughing disease: lung cancer/chronic coughing disease, and it too may not seem as serious.