I’ve bought one of the Hilo (previously Aktiia) wearables and so far, so good in terms of comparison to the Omron cuff device I have used previously (and appears identical to what my GP surgery uses).
Hilo comes with the wearable band and a cuff that is used periodically to calibrate the results (it says to do so once a month as a minimum). Having done the initial setup and calibration, I wasn’t convinced that the results were right as I knew broadly where I normally am, so compared back to my Omron and was about 20 higher than I’d expect.
So, I did the calibration again last night and sure enough, it came up different and eventually it agreed with my Omron.
Today it’s been quietly ticking away, taken 38 measurements so far, including the couple that it prompted me to do, using the camera on my phone, which again, correlates accurately to my Omron.
I’ve had to swap my watch to my right wrist as it suggests best to wear on the non-dominant wrist as it is typically measured when there is no movement. Am thus adjusting 40-odd years of watch wearing to my other wrist.
Yes, it’s expensive, but, am hoping it gives me some insights to what affects my BP and can provide my GP with the stats and see if they will accept - time will tell on that front.
I’m encouraged by the correlation to my Omron cuff so far, even if the old stethoscope way is best, most of us don’t have that ability and it’s been approved by numerous countries for use.
Can report back in sure course when I’ve done a decent stint with it. Battery life is also encouraging, suggests 14 days.
ETA - I think it helps my knowing what my ‘normal’ is to know the numbers were wrong. So, would probably benefit early on to take manual readings to check what the wrist band is saying - the phone camera readings I took to check were in the region of where I expected, so, it has means to do so.