Ravn
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Interesting study, especially the "hidden" OI.
One grumble though: if I understood correctly some patients fit Fukuda and others CCC. But then they just seem to have lumped them all together. In such a large cohort that seems like a missed opportunity to look separately at them or, even better, to look separately at Fukuda without PEM, Fukuda with PEM, and CCC. Maybe the few whose CBF didn't change much were non-PEM patients?
In the present study, if I understood correctly, they excluded the most severe patients because they didn't want to expose them to the strain of the test. So mobile sedentary controls would be suitable.
One grumble though: if I understood correctly some patients fit Fukuda and others CCC. But then they just seem to have lumped them all together. In such a large cohort that seems like a missed opportunity to look separately at them or, even better, to look separately at Fukuda without PEM, Fukuda with PEM, and CCC. Maybe the few whose CBF didn't change much were non-PEM patients?
You're not thinking too fast. A prompt replication study that includes a disease control group as well as healthy controls would be great.It would be interesting to look at people with other conditions causing stiff PRBCs, to see if they have the same response to it.... (Thinking ahead too quickly, as always – obviously the first priority would be bigger studies in ME!)
I think a little while ago there was a call for participants for a study that was looking at the effects of prolonged bed rest on healthy people. Or something along those lines. Wonder if CBF was on the list of things they were going to look at.-then whether this happens for a healthy control who has been paid to spend 1-2 months horizontal.
In the present study, if I understood correctly, they excluded the most severe patients because they didn't want to expose them to the strain of the test. So mobile sedentary controls would be suitable.
Maybe not a biomarker as we don't know yet how specific to ME the findings are. But could be useful for proving disability. If you were an employer, would you risk employing someone with such compromised brain function?-could it be considered a biomarker?