ukxmrv
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I think it's natural that we're more likely to hear anecdotes from people who had a rough time of it than those with no real side effects to speak of.simply because people who have had issues are more likely to discuss them.
This doesn't make the issues any less unpleasant I'm sure.
That argument was the one used against us with harms from GET.
Having seen it used in that context against me makes me resistant to it here unless we have some evidence that it is likely.
The ME association poll may not be worded well but I can't see why patients should be any less believed over adverse reactions to a vaccine than GET.
If it is one vaccine over another we should know and someone should be picking this up and looking at it.
Last edited: