Coyne’s open letter to the National Health and Research Medical Centre (NHMRC) of Australia

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS news' started by Cheshire, Dec 7, 2017.

  1. Cheshire

    Cheshire Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,675
    Skycloud, Obermann, sea and 24 others like this.
  2. Hoopoe

    Hoopoe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,276
    Excellent letter.
     
    MEMarge, Melanie and Andy like this.
  3. Allele

    Allele Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,047
    Go James
     
    MEMarge, Melanie and Andy like this.
  4. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,393
    Interesting. I don't really know enough about the Australian situation to comment. I think Cochrane have been shit though. I can't believe that they've still not corrected the already published Larun review, and are now doing a new one from Larun, co-authoring with White, Chalder, Wearden, etc.
     
    Andy, Valentijn, Webdog and 1 other person like this.
  5. Justy

    Justy Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    193
    Good he has written this, but it is full of typos and errors, which is a shame. Needs a good proofread, hopefully the original letter was not as error ridden.
     
    Webdog, Esther12, Trish and 1 other person like this.
  6. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    22,394
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    I believe I'm right in saying that he has said publicly that he is dyslexic so the errors probably come from that. Yes, a proofread by someone else would do wonders but I could well imagine that having to wait for someone to proofread his work would get very annoying for him.
     
    Scarecrow, Esther12, Viola and 3 others like this.
  7. Justy

    Justy Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    193
    I didnt know that about his dyslexia, so feel a bit wrong having pointed it out now.
     
    Andy and Valentijn like this.
  8. Binkie4

    Binkie4 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,424
    From a reading of the letter, I think there were considerable time constraints in play e.g. he began by saying he hoped it reached them in time to be considered and there was a mention of Dec 7th. This may have meant it went off in a rush.
     
  9. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,393
    Always worth pointing out problems/errors imo, regardless of what causes them. It's not like you were being remotely cruel about it!
     
    Justy, Trish, Andy and 1 other person like this.
  10. Lidia

    Lidia Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    155
    I like that he mentioned MCRI, as they are highly respected in Australia and one of the authors of the pediatric primer is a researcher there (Katherine Rowe).
     

Share This Page