I have another thought I’d like to discuss, as I’m not well versed in immunology and may be missing something obvious.
I remember a very severe person who self-administered daratumumab. As I understand it, his PEM resolved, but his orthostatic intolerance did not improve.
Cyclophosphamide has a broader and somewhat different mechanism of action than daratumumab, and some profoundly severe ME/CFS patients have reportedly entered remission after cyclophosphamide-based treatment.
Does this suggest that PEM and orthostatic intolerance may not necessarily share the same underlying driver? For example, could a treatment that removes one immune component (such as a plasma-cell/antibody-mediated process) improve PEM while leaving another mechanism - perhaps one more relevant to dysautonomia or orthostatic intolerance - largely untouched?
Could it also be that patients have somewhat different autoantibody or immune profiles, so that the most appropriate approach might differ between individuals? For example, in some patients a plasma-cell/antibody-mediated component may be a major driver, and targeted plasma-cell depletion with daratumumab might be enough to produce a remission. In others, a broader immunomodulatory effect (cyclophosphamide) might be needed because several immune mechanisms are contributing.
I’m mainly trying to understand whether the differing responses to daratumumab and cyclophosphamide are consistent with the idea that ME/CFS theoretically may involve several partially separable pathophysiological mechanisms.