DecodeME in the media

Hutan said:
In that Newsweek article, it was great that Chris was quoted as saying ME/CFS is often misdiagnosed as depression. His two talking points there were very good.



Anyone paying attention would then note that those misdiagnoses are likely to precede a diagnosis of ME/CFS, rather than previous depression increasing the risk of developing ME/CFS.
Click to expand...
I see what you did there! :laugh:
 
bobbler said:
what people are very worried about with this particular piece of research is that I’m quite a lot of the people who were part of the study had actually self-reported this condition so they hadn’t necessarily had a formal diagnosis
Click to expand...
This is really something that should be strongly emphasized in response: this is an entirely medicine-created problem, where most physicians refuse to diagnose ME/CFS, and most health care systems strongly discourage it. Even though it's mostly misleading because there were additional checks, and that person clearly did not bother to find out.

We should not have this problem, it's entirely a consequence of a profession derelict in its duties with its obsession with psychologizing anything they don't understand, and systems that have failed us at every single opportunity despite being constantly petitioned to do better and shown how bad things are. Once again a problem that we have loudly objected to is being used against us to downplay everything about us.

The truth is that we should have been able to easily find 25K people with clinically diagnosed ME/CFS, there are so many more, this process could have been helped by recruiting and channelling those into the studies, thus ensuring more robust findings. In fact, as far as I know there aren't even 25K people in the UK with a clinical diagnosis of ME/CFS, entirely by choice.

But it did not happen, and the only reason for this is that medicine has failed us miserably, have simply refused to do their job. We did not do this, in fact we have specifically objected to it, and yet again it's being used against us. And because they didn't do their job, we can't have jobs, so while many governments, and especially the UK's, are loudly whining about the high costs of disabled people not being able to work, the only reason why is because THEY didn't do THEIR job. So now they need to do their job so we can regain fulfilling lives.
 
Last edited:
The news of Decode ME has reached Hungary too, although so far I have seen only one such article. Portfolio is the largest business/economic news site in the country. They wrote their article based on the one in the Financial Times but they don't really go into details about the study too much. They emphasize that ME/CFS has been stigmatized and neglected and Decode ME may finally help take the disease more seriously. (They gave it a very stupid title though, although that was kind of expected.)

In Hungarian: https://www.portfolio.hu/gazdasag/2...-mostanaban-meglepo-felfedezest-tettek-778777

Google translated version
 
BPS adding community notes to X posts .
Suspected as being Carson but plenty other candidates .
I can't see them ( seemingly you need to be verified )
Essentially non replication being evidence if false positives

 
Hutan said:
In that Newsweek article, it was great that Chris was quoted as saying ME/CFS is often misdiagnosed as depression. His two talking points there were very good.



Anyone paying attention would then note that those misdiagnoses are likely to precede a diagnosis of ME/CFS, rather than previous depression increasing the risk of developing ME/CFS.
Click to expand...
And as we saw in many studies, including a recent paper about MS, this is a common problem, where the prodrome phase is not taken as such, but instead misdiagnosed as mental illness, creating the illusion that it is a risk factor. All of this should be obvious when you consider how common it is to take years to diagnose many diseases.

What they are doing, in fact, is using their own past errors to justify new errors. A systemic problem, not at all limited to ME/CFS, but here those mistakes have completely dominated everything.
 
I do notice a lot of misunderstanding in the coverage about what a GWAS is, framing it somewhat as this meaning a genetic cause for the illness, rather than the actual purpose of a GWAS, which is to narrow down the possible mechanisms.

Unless I myself misunderstood what a GWAS is or what the results mean, but it seems mostly interpreted the wrong way.
 
rvallee said:
I do notice a lot of misunderstanding in the coverage about what a GWAS is, framing it somewhat as this meaning a genetic cause for the illness, rather than the actual purpose of a GWAS, which is to narrow down the possible mechanisms.

Unless I myself misunderstood what a GWAS is or what the results mean, but it seems mostly interpreted the wrong way.
Click to expand...
I have been responding to people misunderstanding it on facebook and reddit all day, I wish this was explained more clearly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom