Differential effects of heartbeat perception training on interoceptive accuracy in high vs. low symptom reporters 2026 Müller et al

Andy

Senior Member (Voting rights)

Highlights​

  • We investigated if post-learning stress after a heartbeat perception training affects interoceptive accuracy (IAc).
  • Differences between high (HSR) and low somatic symptom reporters (LSR) were examined.
  • HSR individuals showed a blunted cortisol response to the acute stressor.
  • After overnight consolidation, HSR showed an increase of IAc if exposed to post-learning stress.
  • Negative SAM and positive HPA axis response to the stressor seem to predict this increase.

Abstract​

Abnormal interoception may be a hallmark of medically-unexplained symptoms (MUS), although its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We investigated whether MUS are associated with enhanced interoceptive learning, potentially facilitated by post-learning stress. From 177 volunteers providing self-reports on MUS, 22 individuals were recruited from the upper and 26 from the lower quartile (high/HSR and low symptom reporters/LSR) and randomly assigned to a stress or a control condition (LSR-stress/n = 12; LSR + stress/n = 14; HSR-stress/n = 11; HSR + stress/n = 11). Participants underwent a heartbeat perception training as interoceptive perceptual learning task, followed by a socially-evaluated cold pressor stress or a control intervention. Interoceptive accuracy was measured using the heartbeat counting and discrimination task at baseline (T₁), 30 min. (T₂) and 24 h (T₃) after the stress/control intervention. Sympatho-adreno-medullary (SAM) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axes were measured in terms of heart rate, blood pressure (SBP/DBP) and salivary cortisol reflected reactivity.

The stress test induced a robust increase of SBP/DBP in both stress groups, and a cortisol increase in the LSR + stress group only. Post-learning stress induced an increase of interoceptive accuracy (heartbeat discrimination) the HSR + stress group only. Correlation/regression analyses showed a positive association between changes in interoceptive accuracy (heartbeat discrimination) from T1 to T2 with MUS, and changes from T2 to T3 with SAM and HPA axis responsiveness. Post-learning stress may enhance interoceptive learning in MUS, which may explain why benign body sensations are perceived as symptoms. While MUS-specific heightened attention to body sensations may be responsible for early effects, physiological stress axes may explain late effects of interoceptive learning, including overnight consolidation.

Paywall
 
It really doesn't occur to anyone involved in this that it makes no sense? And that it's the exact same junk they've always asserted, with a cheap trick?

In many ways, this is in fact regression from the days of the Stanford prison experiment. This discipline has learned nothing from their many failures.
 
Back
Top Bottom