Glad that you are back home, Graham. Hopefully they have it right this time.Thanks all for the support. I got back home yesterday afternoon. Will post properly when I start to pick up! Finally getting some treatment that makes sense.
Did you tell him you had published peer reviews papers about ME? We really need a card to take in to hospital with basic facts about ME. Does the MEA do something like that?Following that, one of the more senior doctors came in, and I started to explain. I think he had just hurriedly looked up ME on the NICE guidelines, and, trying to be helpful, suggested that he could arrange for me to see a physio and get some GET. I don't think he knew what hit him! He did concede that perhaps I knew a bit more about it than he did.
I would be worried about taking a combative approach with people who have the power to make your life worse.I honestly don't think a card would work. What it needs is a combative approach, delivered in person to the key clinicians, so that they can each raise various objections (e.g. no tests, no approved treatment, etc.) and have them shot down in flames. It has to be someone with the confidence to carry it off, faced with some who still think of themselves as knowing much more than other folk.
I did pitch in about being involved in a lot of the in depth analysis, and having had a couple of studies published in my own name, but I was pretty brainfogged at the time, so I may not have been as clear as I "remember".
Perhaps, later, when this is over and I feel fitter, I will push a bit more. After having to face parents at governers' meetings ("Why aren't the maths results as good as the English results?", and no support from the head, who taught English and proudly proclaimed he know nothing of maths – along with the chair of the governors), I can do confident combative! Mind you, I don't think they would be interested for one moment.
I mean a scientifically combative approach, challenging them to justify their stance after providing evidence to the contrary. It is possible to be scientifically combative, but remain pleasant. Well, perhaps being pleasant is a bit more of a challenge for me, but I try.I would be worried about taking a combative approach with people who have the power to make your life worse.
Perhaps, later, when this is over and I feel fitter, I will push a bit more. After having to face parents at governers' meetings ("Why aren't the maths results as good as the English results?", and no support from the head, who taught English and proudly proclaimed he know nothing of maths – along with the chair of the governors), I can do confident combative! Mind you, I don't think they would be interested for one moment.
I mean a scientifically combative approach, challenging them to justify their stance after providing evidence to the contrary. It is possible to be scientifically combative, but remain pleasant. Well, perhaps being pleasant is a bit more of a challenge for me, but I try.
This is mentioned here: https://www.s4me.info/threads/working-hypothesis-looking-for-feedback-thoughts.11945/#post-212175Best wishes @Graham. So sorry for what you are going through.
I´d like to highlight this study by Dr. M. Maes et.al as he has been working quite a lot with the gut issues in ME/CFS.
There are more studies to check up if you´d be interested. I guess you know about him already. Though, I couldn´t find, at a quick look, that MM was mentioned here before
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19112401/
. 2008 Dec;29(6):902-10.
Normalization of Leaky Gut in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) Is Accompanied by a Clinical Improvement: Effects of Age, Duration of Illness and the Translocation of LPS From Gram-Negative Bacteria
Michael Maes 1, Jean-Claude Leunis