Suggests maybe that some poor folks with ME screwing up their lives, and no bugger believing them, were pretty rational in their suicidal thoughts.This stands out to me.In addition, 7.1% of patients with ME and CFS endorsed SI but do not meet the criteria for clinical depression
The stigma and disbelief is in part fueled by the all in the mind narrative promoted by Wessely et al. They would disagree they are sending out this message but it's hard to interpret their statement about illness beliefs perpetuating the illness any differently.
Some relevant statements by Sharpe in the press:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...fessor-claims-sufferers-not-push-recover.html
They rightly say they are not claiming ME/CFS per se is all in the mind, but in saying that they are, as usual, being rather deceitful, because the reality of what they are saying - in colloquial parlance - amounts to much the same thing. They are saying that believing you cannot carefully exercise your way back to good physical health, and so recover from ME/CFS, is all in the mind. As they see it ME/CFS is a combination of being deconditioned, together with a mindset that the physical problem is something else and so cannot be recovered from. Any ordinary mortal will interpret that as saying, in effect, it is all in the mind. It's a subtle but important distinction, that the BPS crew forever play on. Poor old Michael Fish pointed out for ages that the major storm that hit the UK in Oct 1987 was technically not a hurricane, so he had been right to tell people not to worry about a hurricane being on the way. Pedantry is not a get out in many cases however.The stigma and disbelief is in part fueled by the all in the mind narrative promoted by Wessely et al. They would disagree they are sending out this message but it's hard to interpret their statement about illness beliefs perpetuating the illness any differently.
IMO the stigma has been wholly manufactured by Wessely and pals and is a direct result of their arrant nonsense.
Also interesting. So is his implication here that the media's projection of ME is the real problem, and does he seek to distance himself from that?Interesting you should say this. I found this article by Wessely and a student of his in BMJ from 1994 saying it's all the media's fault - Professional and popular views of CFS [pdf]. I guess that's what prompted them to want to try to control the media via the SMC...
Interesting you should say this. I found this article by Wessely and a student of his in BMJ from 1994 saying it's all the media's fault - Professional and popular views of CFS [pdf]. I guess that's what prompted them to want to try to control the media via the SMC...
Edit: I missed the subtly hidden link (), so may have got this out of context.
And straight in it goes with ...I'll fix the link so it's more obvious (and also to add the pubmed link which includes further links to commentary).
btw - Just found another one - White's had a go - Views on the nature of CFS
... despite protestations from the BPS camp (MS recently I think) that much of their research focus has been on CFS rather than ME.Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), also known as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)
Funny isn't it. The opinions we've sampled, that have been so strongly influenced down the years by our distorted beliefs, we now use as 'evidence' that our distorted beliefs must be right.In conclusion, this study demonstrated the different opinions that various groups hold regarding the nature of CFS/ME. CFS/ME is yet another condition that illustrates the importance of adopting the biopsychosocial model in our way of thinking
Cosy.Reviewer
Simon Wessely
Interesting you should say this. I found this article by Wessely and a student of his in BMJ from 1994 saying it's all the media's fault - Professional and popular views of CFS [pdf]. I guess that's what prompted them to want to try to control the media via the SMC...
You are so right! He did a paper where he said the claims that CFS patients were type A personalities and overachievers were wrong without ever mentioning that it was him and his cronies that were the only ones saying it. His website said that CFS was neurasthenia and that it disappeared for most of the 20th century until the 80s, carefully omitting the epidemics as that did not fit his theories at all.
I remember activists getting frustrated that he kept claiming people with CFS, as he insisted it was called, had bad coping skills without ever asking anyone how they actually coped.
They claimed it was fashionable - not when we became ill. They claimed it was spread by the internet - not when we became ill. They claimed it was caused by total bed rest - never knew anyone who recommended total bed rest.
Every time there was an article or a TV programme about us there would be a letter published from a "sufferer from depression" complaining that anyone saying ME was not a mental illness was attacking them and all the poor mental health patients. I am not so naive now and believe they were all planted to make us out to be the attackers not the victims.
I remember David Baddiel (UK "comedian") saying something like this in the press along the lines of "why don't people with CFS just shut up and admit that they have depression". It was in the context of stigma.