1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 15th April 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Etiology: graphic representations

Discussion in 'General Advocacy Discussions' started by Simone, May 20, 2020.

  1. Simone

    Simone Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    449
    Location:
    Australia
    Hi brains trust!

    I’m looking for a graphic that presents a possible biomedical model of ME/CFS for a project I’m working on. I’ve got this one, from a Maes & Twisk article in 2010, but ideally I’d like something more recent and which isn’t framed as biopsychosocial.

    Any thoughts?

    Source for this image: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7015-8-35
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,512
    Location:
    London, UK
    I don't think we have a clear enough picture to want to build a diagram of that sort. Diagrams like that in biomedical science are mostly very dubious and misleading. They are popular because they look as if they mean something but generally don't. People like to draw lots of circuits and loops but most of the time the mathematical basis is unsound. Diagrams really only start to hold water once you know in detail what is going on.
     
  3. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    52,337
    Location:
    UK
    That Maes and Twisk one seems to suggest symptoms are perpetuated by psychological stress. The biological bits look speculative. We don't know if they are accurate. So I agree, it's BPS and not useful.
    I dont like these sort of diagrams - we see them all over the BPS publications full of nonsense dressed up to look complicated and scientific when they are prejudiced nonsense.
    As Jonathan Edwards says, we dont yet know the biological basis of ME, so what would you put in the diagram?
     
  4. Hoopoe

    Hoopoe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,255
    If the goal is to show an audience that there is a biological basis to the illness, then the epidemiology and selected findings like the responses to a 2-day CPET could be good.
     
    Simone, alktipping and Andy like this.
  5. sebaaa

    sebaaa Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    26
    Here's a review article from 2019 by Warren Tate that should give you an overview of the current scientific literature. It doesn't have a diagram so I guess you could make your own and add bits from this review article to it. Of course, it's a bit difficult to have anything conclusive since, like others said, we don't have a clear picture of the disease.
     
    Simone and alktipping like this.
  6. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,511
    Location:
    Belgium
    Graphic representation of ME/CFS

    [​IMG]
     
    sebaaa, Simone, TigerLilea and 14 others like this.
  7. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    26,938
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Yes.
    About all we know is
    1. Infections(viral, bacterial, amoebic) (or other triggers) sometimes lead to ME/CFS (but some particular infections don't seem to be a trigger)
    2. Personality traits (as measured in the Dubbo study) including hypochondria have no meaningful impact on the risk of developing ME/CFS (e.g. the Cvejic 2019 paper)
    3. CBT to correct 'faulty thinking' and GET to correct approaches to activity have no meaningful impact on ME/CFS, suggesting that neither faulty thinking, a phobia about activity or deconditioning are causes

    Although, some would question whether 'other triggers' really do cause ME/CFS. And many would debate the name. And some still cling to beliefs about personality and behavioural problems. So, Michiel's graphic seems about right.
     
    sebaaa, Simone, alktipping and 2 others like this.
  8. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    52,337
    Location:
    UK
    And even that is unclear, simply because the research hasn't been done.
     
    rvallee, Simone, alktipping and 2 others like this.
  9. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,385
    Yes, the good thing about that diagram is it clearly shows why it is wrong. The "Psychological stress" feedback loop, apparently able to provoke the same physical characteristics that are shown as perpetuating ME/CFS.

    When we know enough about what ME/CFS really is then such diagrams will be very helpful.
     
    sebaaa, Simone, alktipping and 2 others like this.
  10. Simone

    Simone Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    449
    Location:
    Australia
    I agree. I don’t think we do either, which is partly why I wanted to replace this one (which is currently proposed for this project). The people I’m working with want a nice picture, but I’m leaning towards us just providing a couple of sentences on some of the current hypotheses, to show that nothing is set is stone, but that there are biomedical hypotheses around.
     
    Barry, Trish, Hutan and 1 other person like this.
  11. Simone

    Simone Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    449
    Location:
    Australia
    ha! ;)
     
    Barry, Trish and Hutan like this.
  12. Simone

    Simone Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    449
    Location:
    Australia
    Yep, I’ve got those.
     
    Trish likes this.
  13. Simone

    Simone Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    449
    Location:
    Australia
    Thanks for your responses, everyone. You’ve confirmed my instinct to push for having the diagram I posted removed from the project entirely.
     
    Barry, Trish and Hutan like this.

Share This Page