Formerhuman
Established Member (Voting Rights)
Obviously, there is a lack of scientific evidence to support these options, and there is a conflict of interest. I'd like to emphasize that such suggestions as I quote:
“Clopidogrel 75 mg is typically dosed once daily, and may be combined with aspirin and/or apixaban after very careful consideration of the risks associated with dual or triple therapy.”
are not only unevidenced but clearly dangerous for patients.
I can't help but mention the Paxlovid suggestion. There is no evidence of replication in people with LC. Two CTs failed. Why? Just why?
I believe the majority of clinicians don't use such sources of information in their clinical practice. Rather, it is a realm of moneymaking private clinics and we can't change it.
From my perspective, the bigger issue is that the same people and organizations who write such guides as the Mount Sinai guide or this one have influence over political decisions in the realm of ME/CFS and Long Covid. There is no funding for ME/CFS research. RECOVER-TLC is a total failure. After all, why do we need studies and trials if there are 41 options which are “especially helpful for…”?
“Clopidogrel 75 mg is typically dosed once daily, and may be combined with aspirin and/or apixaban after very careful consideration of the risks associated with dual or triple therapy.”
are not only unevidenced but clearly dangerous for patients.
I can't help but mention the Paxlovid suggestion. There is no evidence of replication in people with LC. Two CTs failed. Why? Just why?
I believe the majority of clinicians don't use such sources of information in their clinical practice. Rather, it is a realm of moneymaking private clinics and we can't change it.
From my perspective, the bigger issue is that the same people and organizations who write such guides as the Mount Sinai guide or this one have influence over political decisions in the realm of ME/CFS and Long Covid. There is no funding for ME/CFS research. RECOVER-TLC is a total failure. After all, why do we need studies and trials if there are 41 options which are “especially helpful for…”?