1. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 28th November 2022 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Low Cardiorespiratory Fitness Post-COVID-19: A Narrative Review, 2022, Schwendinger et al

Discussion in 'Long Covid research' started by Sly Saint, Sep 18, 2022.

  1. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,122
    Location:
    UK
    Abstract


    Patients recovering from COVID-19 often report symptoms of exhaustion, fatigue and dyspnoea and present with exercise intolerance persisting for months post-infection. Numerous studies investigated these sequelae and their possible underlying mechanisms using cardiopulmonary exercise testing. We aimed to provide an in-depth discussion as well as an overview of the contribution of selected organ systems to exercise intolerance based on the Wasserman gears. The gears represent the pulmonary system, cardiovascular system, and periphery/musculature and mitochondria. Thirty-two studies that examined adult patients post-COVID-19 via cardiopulmonary exercise testing were included. In 22 of 26 studies reporting cardiorespiratory fitness (herein defined as peak oxygen uptake—VO2peak), VO2peak was < 90% of predicted value in patients. VO2peak was notably below normal even in the long-term.

    Given the available evidence, the contribution of respiratory function to low VO2peak seems to be only minor except for lung diffusion capacity. The prevalence of low lung diffusion capacity was high in the included studies. The cardiovascular system might contribute to low VO2peak via subnormal cardiac output due to chronotropic incompetence and reduced stroke volume, especially in the first months post-infection. Chronotropic incompetence was similarly present in the moderate- and long-term follow-up. However, contrary findings exist. Peripheral factors such as muscle mass, strength and perfusion, mitochondrial function, or arteriovenous oxygen difference may also contribute to low VO2peak. More data are required, however. The findings of this review do not support deconditioning as the primary mechanism of low VO2peak post-COVID-19. Post-COVID-19 sequelae are multifaceted and require individual diagnosis and treatment.


    FormalPara Key Points
    Exercise intolerance post-COVID-19 may likely have several causes and is not solely explained by deconditioning.
    Peripheral followed by cardiovascular factors as well as lung diffusion limitations are central for long-term sequelae.
    This work will improve the understanding of possible underlying mechanisms of low cardiorespiratory fitness post-COVID-19 and at the same time promote cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a valuable diagnostic tool in patients post-COVID-19. Based on this, more targeted rehabilitation programmes could be developed in the future.

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-022-01751-7
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 20, 2022
    Michelle, Hutan, Snow Leopard and 2 others like this.
  2. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,805
    Location:
    Canada
    They only need to pay attention to the many, many, many people who were in peak physical conditions mere days or weeks before they developed the condition to know that it plays no role at all. In the end weeks or months of inability to exert will obviously lower that conditioning but if the symptoms are present at the start it's absurd to attribute them to time since it began. It's very important to differentiate the factors that are relevant before, during and after.

    That's really the most disappointing part of how medical research works, it's not at all like investigative work, they ignore most of the leads and evidence to focus on a small subset, but never bother checking whether it's consistent with the rest of the evidence. Like trying to solve a puzzle by arbitrarily taking a few pieces and extrapolating from that. It would prevent so much waste and obsession over dead-ends if there was a real investigative process. If this was the approach law enforcement took in criminal investigations it would be disastrous, completely ineffective. With these standards white collar crimes would be rampant as they would simply never get caught.
     
  3. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,052
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Generally reasonable literature review (covid-related) and overview of the physiology of the levels that may ultimately impact VO2(peak). They divide these into: respiratory, cardiovascular and peripheral muscle/mitochondria. Generally argues against deconditioning, as above.

    However, there's an absolute howler at the end —

    Are they really suggesting that fatigue by necessity == psychological? The paper they reference in this section is Cardiorespiratory physiology, exertional symptoms, and psychological burden in post-COVID-19 fatigue (2022). The relevant passage from that paper is —

    — concluding —

    I don't understand how the authors of this thread's paper could spend pages discussing around a framework of (1) respiratory (2) cardiovascular and (3) peripheral muscular/mitochondrial causes, and then take this other paper that does not mention (3) at all — instead proposing normal (1) and normal (2) therefore must be (x) psychological.
     
    Sean, Michelle, BrightCandle and 4 others like this.

Share This Page