(We have a members only thread on magnesium deficiency here)
I know a lot of members take magnesium, and there does look to be good evidence for magnesium deficiency being fairly common, and credible support for orally administered magnesium being useful for things like muscle spasms, and possibly high blood pressure and migraine.
But I remember when I looked into transdermal magnesium some years ago that the evidence for magnesium absorption through unbroken skin was weak and contradictory.
There's a 2017 study title 'Myth or Reality - Transdermal Magnesium' which is a bit oddly written, but cites a lot of studies. It concluded that magnesium supplementation can be important in addressing health conditions, but transdermal magnesium is a 'scientifically not yet proven form of magnesium application'. It found that there was a bit more evidence for magnesium in creams and that there should be more research on creams with higher concentration of magnesium administered for longer durations. The evidence for magnesium chloride solutions being useful seems to be very weak indeed.
A problem is that entities with conflicts of interest have been involved in studies.
There's a mention of one of the first studies of transdermal magnesium absorption. published in 2000 by the founder of the Americas Holistic Medical Association, an early advocate for the benefits of transdermal applications of magnesium. But, only an abstract for a conference without data was published to support the claimed improvement in magnesium deficiency from transdermal application.
There's mention of another study supporting Epsom salt baths - but it was reported only published on website of an Epsom salt council, and not in a peer-reviewed journal.
The Israeli Army made a skin cream that they hoped would prevent the absorption of chemical warfare agents. The cream was described as 'magnesium-rich'; it had magnesium sulphate. 34 health volunteers applied the cream 3 times a day for 3 days. This regime didn't affect blood magnesium levels.
A study with magnesium chloride solution (often called 'magnesium oil') found that absorption of magnesium was no different than when just the potassium chloride buffer was used. But better results were found for a magnesium chloride cream (maybe a patented product?).
One study found:
I haven't gone to the source documents to check those papers. But, I have tried googling. There's an enormous amount of marketing pitches, but very little evidence that transdermal delivery mechanisms are useful.
It's quite remarkable, the extreme difference between multiple marketing claims and the study evidence.
The NIH Magnesium Fact Sheet for Health Professionals (updated in March 2022) looks good. But it only talks about oral administration. Transdermal administration isn't even mentioned.
Have you found good evidence for transdermal magnesium making a difference to magnesium levels in the body or symptoms?
I know a lot of members take magnesium, and there does look to be good evidence for magnesium deficiency being fairly common, and credible support for orally administered magnesium being useful for things like muscle spasms, and possibly high blood pressure and migraine.
But I remember when I looked into transdermal magnesium some years ago that the evidence for magnesium absorption through unbroken skin was weak and contradictory.
There's a 2017 study title 'Myth or Reality - Transdermal Magnesium' which is a bit oddly written, but cites a lot of studies. It concluded that magnesium supplementation can be important in addressing health conditions, but transdermal magnesium is a 'scientifically not yet proven form of magnesium application'. It found that there was a bit more evidence for magnesium in creams and that there should be more research on creams with higher concentration of magnesium administered for longer durations. The evidence for magnesium chloride solutions being useful seems to be very weak indeed.
A problem is that entities with conflicts of interest have been involved in studies.
There's a mention of one of the first studies of transdermal magnesium absorption. published in 2000 by the founder of the Americas Holistic Medical Association, an early advocate for the benefits of transdermal applications of magnesium. But, only an abstract for a conference without data was published to support the claimed improvement in magnesium deficiency from transdermal application.
There's mention of another study supporting Epsom salt baths - but it was reported only published on website of an Epsom salt council, and not in a peer-reviewed journal.
The Israeli Army made a skin cream that they hoped would prevent the absorption of chemical warfare agents. The cream was described as 'magnesium-rich'; it had magnesium sulphate. 34 health volunteers applied the cream 3 times a day for 3 days. This regime didn't affect blood magnesium levels.
A study with magnesium chloride solution (often called 'magnesium oil') found that absorption of magnesium was no different than when just the potassium chloride buffer was used. But better results were found for a magnesium chloride cream (maybe a patented product?).
One study found:
That's not sounding very impressive. There is a possibility that people with a magnesium deficiency might have higher increases in blood magnesium, as any excess over healthy levels will be excreted.After the Mg2+ cream intervention there was a clinically relevant increase in serum magnesium (0.82 to 0.89 mmol/L, p = 0.29) that was not seen in the placebo group (n = 10) (0.77 to 0.79 mmol/L), but this difference was only statistically significant (p = 0.02)) in a subgroup of non-athletes (n = 20).
I haven't gone to the source documents to check those papers. But, I have tried googling. There's an enormous amount of marketing pitches, but very little evidence that transdermal delivery mechanisms are useful.
It's quite remarkable, the extreme difference between multiple marketing claims and the study evidence.
The NIH Magnesium Fact Sheet for Health Professionals (updated in March 2022) looks good. But it only talks about oral administration. Transdermal administration isn't even mentioned.
Magnesium Deficiency
Symptomatic magnesium deficiency due to low dietary intake in otherwise-healthy people is uncommon because the kidneys limit urinary excretion of this mineral [3]. However, habitually low intakes or excessive losses of magnesium due to certain health conditions, chronic alcoholism, and/or the use of certain medications can lead to magnesium deficiency.
Early signs of magnesium deficiency include loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and weakness. As magnesium deficiency worsens, numbness, tingling, muscle contractions and cramps, seizures, personality changes, abnormal heart rhythms, and coronary spasms can occur [1,2]. Severe magnesium deficiency can result in hypocalcemia or hypokalemia (low serum calcium or potassium levels, respectively) because mineral homeostasis is disrupted [2].
Groups at Risk of Magnesium Inadequacy
Magnesium inadequacy can occur when intakes fall below the RDA but are above the amount required to prevent overt deficiency. The following groups are more likely than others to be at risk of magnesium inadequacy because they typically consume insufficient amounts or they have medical conditions (or take medications) that reduce magnesium absorption from the gut or increase losses from the body.
People with gastrointestinal diseases
People with Type 2 diabetes
People with alcohol dependence
Older adults
Have you found good evidence for transdermal magnesium making a difference to magnesium levels in the body or symptoms?
Last edited: