Medical ambivalence and Long Covid: The disconnects, entanglements, and productivities shaping ethnic minority experiences in the UK, 2025, Ridge+

Discussion in 'Long Covid research' started by SNT Gatchaman, Dec 27, 2024 at 12:31 AM.

  1. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,024
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Medical ambivalence and Long Covid: The disconnects, entanglements, and productivities shaping ethnic minority experiences in the UK
    Ridge; Broom; Alwan; Chew-Graham; Smyth; Gopal; Kingstone; Gaszczyk; Begum

    Structural violence -related to ‘isms’ like racism, sexism, and ableism – pertains to the ways in which social institutions harm certain groups. Such violence is critical to institutional indifference to the plight of ethnic minority people living with long-term health conditions. With only emergent literature on the lived experiences of ethnic minorities with Long Covid, we sought to investigate experiences around the interplay of illness and structural vulnerabilities. Thirty-one semi-structured interviews with a range of UK-based participants of varying ethnic minorities, ages and socio-economic situations were undertaken online between June 2022 and June 2023. A constant comparison analysis was used to develop three over-arching themes: (1) Long Covid and social recognition; (2) The violence of medical ambivalence; and (3) Pathways to recognition and support.

    Findings showed that while professional recognition and support were possible, participants generally faced the spectre and deployment of a particular mode of structural violence, namely ‘medical ambivalence’. The contours of medical ambivalence in the National Health Service (NHS) as an institution had consequences, including inducing or accentuating suffering via practices of care denial. Despite multiple structurally shaped ordeals (like healthcare, community stigma, and sexism), many participants were nevertheless able to gain recognition for their condition (e.g. online, religious communities).

    Participants with more resources were in the best position to ‘cobble together’ their own approaches to care and support, despite structural headwinds.

    Link (Social Science & Medicine) [Open Access]
     
  2. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,024
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
     
    Turtle, Sean, bobbler and 1 other person like this.
  3. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,024
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
     
  4. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,024
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    An additional problem being, of course, that if the inequities were resolved, those unhelpful NHS approaches still apply. No-one with this condition gets adequate care.
     
  5. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,024
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Good quotes. Someone should probably try to address the problem - perhaps NHS England might like to take a look.
     
  6. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,264
    Location:
    Australia
    Getting ME/CFS or LC already puts you in a minority, both on the general health spectrum, and in the way different patient groups are treated within the health system.
     
    Missense, Peter Trewhitt and bobbler like this.

Share This Page