Medical Express - Scientists say studies of infection-triggered chronic conditions have been undermined by unproven diagnoses

Kalliope

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
quotes:

In an article in Brain, researchers from Rutgers University, the National Institutes of Health, Rockefeller University, New York Medical College, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Stony Brook University, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory and other institutions contend that studies of infection-associated chronic illnesses suffer recurring problems such as the failure to prove participants have the relevant pathogen.

...

Studies of long COVID, which affects an estimated 9 million Americans, face similar challenges, particularly the tendency to group patients with possible different underlying mechanisms into a single population. Research into myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome is even more difficult because no causative pathogen has been identified.

Yet progress is possible, even without knowledge of the underlying infection. The authors point to multiple sclerosis (MS) as evidence that rigorous study design has yielded helpful FDA-approved treatments.

...

"The framework we advocate is a major step forward since it provides rigorous and well-thought-out guidelines for every aspect of conducting clinical trials in this patient population," said co-author Avindra Nath, physician-scientist and clinical director of the NIH's National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.



 
I didn't know where to post this article as the paper doesn't seem to have been published yet.

It's titled:
"Designing studies for post-treatment Lyme disease and other infection-associated chronic illnesses", Brain (2026).

Jonas Bergquist is among the authors:


Paul Arnaboldi, New York Medical College
Jacqueline Becker, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Avindra Nath, National Institutes of Health
Patricia Coyle, Stony Brook University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine
Andrew Handel, Stony Brook University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine
Timothy Sellati, Diasorin Inc
Maria Gomes-Solecki, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine - Nashville Campus
Sandra Garcet, The Rockefeller University
Marianne Henderson, National Institutes of Health
Piper Mullins, Smithsonian Institution
Elliot Cowan, Partners in Diagnostics
Richard McCombie, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Anna-Marie Wellins, Stony Brook University
Mark Allegretta, National Multiple Sclerosis Society
Jonas Bergquist, Uppsala University
Steven Schutzer, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
 
I hope, though without any expectation, that this leads to something, anything, but it's so basic that it could all have been thought of 70 years ago, and was, but the profession decided to not bother instead and there's just too many bodies in the sunk cost bin.

This is basic medicine 101 stuff. Or at least it should be. I guess it must be missing, or maybe it's where they learn to ignore it. No, you can't always know those things, it's part of the job. Having the power not to care and throw it down a memory hole, along with tens of millions of lives, doesn't change the fact. It just makes it all worse, as bad as what the tobacco industry did. Except without any profit, in fact it's a major financial loss when everything gets counted.

If police worked the same way crimes would never lead to convictions unless the perpetrators filmed themselves doing it and confessing to a judge in a continuous shot. In fact no one else gets away with ignoring reality, it's just stunning that basic stuff like this isn't just some fringe insight, but that it's deeply unpopular because no one wants to look inside the sunk cost bin because of the mountains of bodies it holds.
 
Back
Top Bottom