It isn't being recorded last I checked.Do they usually record them?
ETA: and if not, given the wide interest in the topic, could they record it?
It isn't being recorded last I checked.Do they usually record them?
ETA: and if not, given the wide interest in the topic, could they record it?
I have emailed the UCL pain genetics people today and they sound interested in the Showcase meeting. We plan to get together at UCL in due course. If we can find a common target they are seriously good people to get involved
Is this Andreas Goebel's work?
Yes, and it makes me wonder how many other people with relevant expertise might have been overlooked. I hope someone will raise this at the meeting. It should have been someone’s job to invite relevant people. It beggars belief that Jonathan wasn’t invited.Great.
It’s a shame that the MRC/NIHR didn't know to invite them.
Does anyone know anything about these two patient reps? I have come across Opal some time ago from a pretty bad book she self published on behalf of an organisation calling itself the ME/CFS Alliance which has a website but no list of activities or names of people running it and seems to exist purely to sell Opal's book. I gather she was and probably still is active on the CMRC patient rep group. I hope she is more clued up now about the research concerns of pwME.Patient Priorities for the future of research into ME and Long COVID
- Opal Webster-Philp
- Sarah Barley-McCullen
Prof Sivan is a professor of Rehabilitation medicine and runs the Leeds Long Covid service, including working with the app company ELAROS that has put his Leeds service material on an app and is attempting to expand it to include ME/CFS and FM as well in theiir apps. We have not been impressed so far. He seems to recognise that PEM prevents using GET, but has little idea how to help pwME or pwLC apart from rehab based outpatient clinics. It will be interesting to hear whether he has anything useful to say about research.Prof Manoj Sivan,University of Leeds: Health Effects From Infection sequelae: Tailoring Services and Advancing Guidance (HERITAGE) study in Long COVID and ME/CFS
Et in arcadia ego.Prof Sivan is a professor of Rehabilitation medicine and runs the Leeds Long Covid service, including working with the app company ELAROS that has put his Leeds service material on an app and is attempting to expand it to include ME/CFS and FM as well in theiir apps. We have not been impressed so far. He seems to recognise that PEM prevents using GET, but has little idea how to help pwME or pwLC apart from rehab based outpatient clinics. It will be interesting to hear whether he has anything useful to say about research.
He led the design of an LC questionnaire called C19-YRS, discussed here;The modified COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRSm) patient-reported outcome measure for Long Covid or Post-COVID-19 syndrome, 2022, Sivan
Not good that virtual attendees can't participate in the afternoon workshops. That excludes patients. Also if I were a new researcher to the scene (the sort of people we want to attract in). I'd probably have gone for a virtual ticket to see what's what without having to commit to travel.
Not just patients also researchers. They are saying it would be too expensive to have some virtual breakout rooms along with those who are attending in person. I think it says something about how they see ME as a priority.
Does anyone know if they expanded virtual numbers beyond 50? I'm sure there must be more wanting to attend.
Does anyone know if they expanded virtual numbers beyond 50?
The fact that they are not planning to record the day also suggests that this is seen as low priority.
I wonder if they asked the speakers.I think recording is different as the speakers need to be happy with that. But this was already the minimum that the MRC thought they could get away with.
That’s BS. Virtual breakout rooms became standard during lockdown. They should be able to manage with a single staff member that can pop in and out to help people if there are issues. Planning virtual breakouts doesn’t take much extra effort. I’ve done it myself multiple times.Not just patients also researchers. They are saying it would be too expensive to have some virtual breakout rooms along with those who are attending in person. I think it says something about how they see ME as a priority.
That is what I have been telling them.That’s BS. Virtual breakout rooms became standard during lockdown. They should be able to manage with a single staff member that can pop in and out to help people if there are issues. Planning virtual breakouts doesn’t take much extra effort. I’ve done it myself multiple times.
I believe around 100 virtual and 80 in person.Yes they did.