My Doctor Told Me My Pain Was All in My Head. It Ended Up Saving Me. 2021 Medical examiner article

Makes people believe that there must be really well thought out ideas and hypothesis on the basis of concepts like "central sensitization". I have tried to find out where that concept originated from, it's pretty hard to find out. It seems to me (after reading for while) based on some research with rats and then the whole thing got extrapolated, extrapolated some more and then some popular sauce was poured over it and now every GP in the world is saying central sensitization is the cause of everything, without having any clue what it actually means.
You expressed my own feelings on the matter so eloquently, @unicorn7.

"popular sauce" :rofl::rofl::rofl:!!
 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33471404/

By the way, is there anyone here who would describe success in pain treatment as best quantified via improvements in self-compassion? I often see doctors state that patients don't want the pain to be gone, but rather that they just want the negative effects of it on their lives to be gone, thus the propensity to choose more "meaningful" outcomes for trials than say, some more direct measure of pain intensity, whatever that looks like. To me, that just sounds like a cop-out answer for not being able to actually do anything "meaningful" about the pain.
 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33471404/

By the way, is there anyone here who would describe success in pain treatment as best quantified via improvements in self-compassion? I often see doctors state that patients don't want the pain to be gone, but rather that they just want the negative effects of it on their lives to be gone, thus the propensity to choose more "meaningful" outcomes for trials than say, some more direct measure of pain intensity, whatever that looks like. To me, that just sounds like a cop-out answer for not being able to actually do anything "meaningful" about the pain.
This is hilarious, @Sphyma! A self-compassion intervention for pain whose primary outcome measure is not pain, but self-compassion. Its like attempting to treat pain by pouring green paint over people, then observing that they do indeed turn green, proving the pain treatment successful!

In the study, there's no significant benefit of the therapy (compared to the control condition) at reducing self-reported pain intensity, but you would never know that from reading the Abstract, which presents the whole thing as a roaring success.
 
Last edited:
This is hilarious, @Sphyma! A self-compassion intervention for pain whose primary outcome measure is not pain, but self-compassion. Its like attempting to treat pain by pouring green paint over people, then observing that they do indeed turn green, proving the pain treatment successful!

In the study, there's no significant benefit of the therapy (compared to the control condition) at reducing self-reported pain intnenisty, but you would neveer know that from reading the Abstract, which presnets the hwole thing as a roaring success.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ejp.1739

I'd recommend reading this commentary on the above trial. Chances are, you'll burst out laughing at one specific part, as I did. You'll know it once you start reading the second paragraph...
 
CBT a "high bar" :rofl::rofl::rofl:!!!

Just thinking on it a bit more, it reminds me of the "recovery" stuff. Since these psychological interventions don't actually help people recover - in the plain meaning of the word - they slyly redefine recovery as "acceptance". That is, lowering your expectations about what getting better would look like.

Likewise, these pain interventions have no effect on pain perception, so they redefine success as "acceptance" of the pain. Its not at all what patients are looking for when they enter pain treatment - its not like they say "I just need help accepting that I'm in constant pain, I need to learn to lower my expectations. I'm so hopelessly unable to do that, I need help!"
 
the "recovery" stuff. Since these psychological interventions don't actually help people recover

On the one hand we are told to increase our self-compassion, and redefine recovery as acceptance of limited lives (and stop bothering the medical system).

On the other hand, we are told to increase our self-management skills to work towards recovery by pushing beyond our moral and physical limitations (so any failure to recover is our fault).
 
People who run these trials and make all these pronouncements have never experienced real pain. They could not have, it is impossible to be so wishy washy about it.

I experience a lot of pain with my ME. When they stopped my painkillers I could not think it was so overwhelming. Yet the pain from my eye disease was searing, screaming and burning and nothing could relieve it except waiting for it to dull down a bit which took about 30 to 40 minutes. The dull pain was bad but nothing like the immediate thing. This cycle kept recurring through the night and I was close to suicidal at the thought this would never end.

A combination of treatments means it is rarely so bad but if I drop my vigilance it builds up again.

I tried to keep a diary when I started the treatment and it helped as I began to see that it was not many times every night anymore but what was strange was how bad I found it to rate the pain. I knew when it was really bad and I knew when it was very mild but in between it was no more than a guess.

Humans don't have a good insight into comparing pain at one point with another.

edit because I left out my main point. There must be people with really severe chronic pain and to offer them these simplistic solutions is inhumane
 
Last edited:
Seems to be a plethora of "recovery is possible" (via personal initiative/agency) memes/narratives around at the moment. So non-specific that it's impossible to tell what, if anything, the person has recovered from and why? And what relevance, if any, there is to anyone else at all.

Using the 'recovered' patients (I see pretty wide, stretchy definitions being used...) narratives are being used unsubtly to 'encourage' such in others - even through there is no objective evidence of this and no idea if anyone has same cause, symptoms, conditions etc. Pretty mucky and yuck.
It's a cruel cowardly fraud.

On the one hand we are told to increase our self-compassion, and redefine recovery as acceptance of limited lives (and stop bothering the medical system).

On the other hand, we are told to increase our self-management skills to work towards recovery by pushing beyond our moral and physical limitations (so any failure to recover is our fault).
While also being told that we are obsessed by our symptoms, too self-pitying, too attention seeking, etc.

So, we are supposed to not pay attention to them in order to break the vicious cycle, and also pay attention to them in order to self-manage and overcome them.

But it has been quite clear for some time that consistency is not their strong point.
 
Back
Top Bottom