Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): diagnosis and management, 2025, Fan et al

forestglip

Moderator
Staff member
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): diagnosis and management

Fan, Jin; Jiao, Jiao; Chang, Hai-Qing; Zhong, Dong-Ling; Liu, Xiao-Bo; Li, Juan; Chen, Ling-Min; Jin, Rong-Jiang; Wu, Xi

[Line breaks added]

Background
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) has garnered substantial scientific and clinical interest, due to its rising global prevalence and significant pathophysiological overlap with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS).

This review systematically elucidates the prevailing diagnostic criteria, summarizes recent advances in understanding the potential pathophysiological mechanisms, and evaluates pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, and symptom-based assessment and management strategies.

Methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published from inception to August 2025.

Results
Current diagnostic frameworks for ME/CFS rely primarily on clinical symptomatology and lack definitive biomarkers. Immune dysregulation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation are central to its pathology. Pharmacological management includes immunomodulatory treatments, antioxidant therapies, mitochondrial support, and neuroinflammation intervention.

Non-pharmacological strategies such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), graded exercise therapy (GET), activity pacing, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) complement biomedical approaches by alleviating symptom severity and promoting energy conservation.

Conclusion
Among these approaches, CBT serves as an adjunctive therapy for symptom management rather than a curative one, whereas GET is contraindicated due to its potential for harm.

Comprehensive clinical assessment and management of ME/CFS requires being symptom oriented and the recognition of individual differences.

Recommended directions for future research include developing biomarker-based diagnostic tools, optimizing combination therapies that target multiple pathophysiological pathways simultaneously, and integrating real-world data and digital health technologies for precise monitoring and management of ME/CFS

Web | DOI | PDF | Journal of Translational Medicine | Open Access
 
Assuming this is not LLM, it looks like the authors believe a «narrative review» is to just parrot whatever is stated in studies without any consideration of the quality of the evidence.

They included two figures.
ME/CFS mevhanisms:
IMG_0522.jpeg

«Guide» to pacing:
IMG_0523.jpeg

It is of course not pacing, but actually GET and includes a BACME-like monitoring regime.

1.3.4 says:
Gradually Increasing Activity: If you have found a sustainable baseline, you can increase activity by 10 % at a time to avoid crashes.
 
Back
Top Bottom