News Article: Court orders Atos to pay disabled woman £5,000 over dishonest PIP assessment

Andy

Senior Member (Voting rights)
A court has ruled that a disabled woman should be awarded £5,000 compensation by the government contractor Atos, after a dishonest report by one of its assessors led to her being awarded the wrong level of benefits.

Vanessa Haley, from Huddersfield, told the county court in her written evidence that the assessor had tried to “impede her entitlement” to the enhanced rate of the daily living component of personal independence payment (PIP) by “falsifying” her assessment report.

The assessment report also led to her being denied any PIP mobility support.

She was awarded the compensation after the court upheld her claim of maladministration against Atos and her allegation that it was responsible for causing her health conditions to worsen.

The news of her court victory came as the minister for disabled people gave evidence to the Commons work and pensions committee yesterday (Wednesday), as part of its inquiry into the PIP and employment and support allowance assessment processes (see separate story).

Disability News Service has been investigating claims of dishonesty at the heart of the PIP assessment system for more than a year, and has heard from nearly 300 disabled people who have made such allegations.
https://www.disabilitynewsservice.c...led-woman-5000-over-dishonest-pip-assessment/
 
I'm glad she was awarded compensation after being treated so appallingly. But what a tiny amount of money for something that significantly damaged her health. Compare that to the hundreds of thousands awarded in some celebrity libel cases which cause far less harm to the person libelled.
 
Hmm, that's unfortunately true: the DWP have shown themselves willing to spend a fortune fighting claimants at tribunal in the name of saving money, so they'd probably make every potentially entitled claimant go through the courts.
 
So you don't think that if they keep being taken to court and losing that the government will simply change the law to ensure this doesn't happen?

Shhhh!! - I'm still trying to be optimistic! They've a track record of doing that so I wouldn't be surprised by it.

The Select Committee are certainly aware of the problem of dishonest reporting by assessors, so maybe that will make a difference. I certainly don't expect the government to put this right because it's the right thing to do.
 
In Germany, a judge's verdict is published, most often online, too. I don't know how it is in the UK. I would be interested in the specifics and on what grounds the court decided in your favor. Maybe I can learn something from that.

Sorry if I should have found this information by myself - help? :)
 
Back
Top Bottom