Very true. The power imbalance is especially wild. If proponents of psychobehavioral models had done the same thing at a medical science conference, for whatever reason they might have felt, then had been physically handled this way, they would have framed it as violent expulsion and infringement of their rights, it would have led to howls of outrage from other physicians, with accusations of censorship and so on.
This is doomed generally, there is no such allyship, but especially with anti-psychiatry not being relevant here. I think psychiatry can be good. It's bad here. It's never a criticism of who they are, it's of what they do and their excesses. Ideally psychiatry would be a force for good, and not a cause of harm, but that's not the case. This isn't about being against psychiatry, it's about making it do what it should be doing, which it clearly isn't, and the reasons for this are pretty much found in this nexus where chronic illness exists.
Could she be one of the women on this page maybe?
www.mindbodylab.no
www.forskning.no
These people should look at the history of resistance movements and feel incredibly grateful that people with MECFS are so steadfastly non violent in their opposition to the immense harm that is being done to them.Here is one of the attendees at the conference claiming to have been scared
Aksjonister stormet forskningskonferanse. – Jeg var redd
Norsk professor sier hun opplevde situasjonen som stressende.
This is the same person in the video who turns around with a smile and looks like she is amused.
Do you have the timestamp and link? The blonde at the front doesn’t turn around in the sick times video.
Here is one of the attendees at the conference claiming to have been scared
Aksjonister stormet forskningskonferanse. – Jeg var redd
Norsk professor sier hun opplevde situasjonen som stressende.
This is the same person in the video who turns around with a smile and looks like she is amused.
There is video, we can hear the audio of him asking them to stop physically handling him, and they still lie about it. They are clearly only annoyed by the interruption and never felt threatened in any way.
They had "big bags and masks". Good grief do they even hear themselves talk? Their hubris is off the charts. They want to affect the lives of millions without ever hearing about how it actually affects them. They are in a completely insulated ideological bubble.
Honestly, reading this nonsense gives more insight into their psychology than anything else has done. Either they are lying, most likely, or they have deep traumatic fear of imaginary threats. Absolutely ridiculous to print this seriously.
"Freedom of expression is under threat", say the people who exclude those most affected by their work to have a say. Most of the messages I have seen were about being ignored and abandoned.
"This is medicine, we can't be bothered with hearing from patients and other various groups!"
I didn't realise that there were different videos of what happened and some taken from another angle. This one is from Youtube Winslow Sante Publique. Around 5-7 seconds in. The blond woman can be seen turning around in this one.
Thank you. To play the devil’s advocate, she turned around before he started speaking and you could hear people groaning. But from the sick times video she doesn’t look scared or agitated, she just sits there normally.
I doubt the handling was illegal. It was a private space, and most places allow people to remove protesters using reasonable force, even though it’s not recommended because it often escalates and you risk being charged with assault etc.
The article translated includes the following:Here is one of the attendees at the conference claiming to have been scared
Aksjonister stormet forskningskonferanse. – Jeg var redd
Norsk professor sier hun opplevde situasjonen som stressende.
This is the same person in the video who turns around with a smile and looks like she is amused.
Oh wow, later on in the article there is another claim based on this same [I assume co-ordinated] delusion/misdirection that if you test a few things you call bio then you can claim the bio model is dead:
