Jonathan Edwards
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I was looking for something else and found these comments. Do you still think ANA might be relevant in the context of Dara for ME/CFS?
It could be but I think other issues are probably more interesting.
I was looking for something else and found these comments. Do you still think ANA might be relevant in the context of Dara for ME/CFS?
Seems to be the page for the pilot.The study will involve ten patients who will receive the medication over a period of time.
It was showing up as being updated in the last 24 hours so maybe it was just edited.Seems to be the page for the pilot.
The study will involve ten patients who will receive the medication over a period of time.
Is ten patients (same as phase 1) what has been discussed previously for phase 2, or is this new information?It says phase 2
This one is for Trial ID: 2024-512500-19-00, which is the pilot.Is ten patients (fewer than phase 1) what has been discussed previously for phase 2, or is this new information?
They’ve described ResetME as a phase 2/3 trial previously. I don’t think the number matters much. If ResetME is positive, an even larger scale might be warranted to get even more data on who it works for and why.
If I’ve understood things correctly, it’s normal to approve drugs after a positive phase 3. Then you might do an even larger phase 4 to understand even more about the nuances and long term dynamics.Let’s say ResetME is shows Dara works.
At what point would patients be able to access the drug? Would they have to wait for yet another trial?
Or would a future trial be able to happen concurrently to patients getting the drug outside the trial.
At what point would patients be able to access the drug?