Jonathan Edwards
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I was looking for something else and found these comments. Do you still think ANA might be relevant in the context of Dara for ME/CFS?
It could be but I think other issues are probably more interesting.
I was looking for something else and found these comments. Do you still think ANA might be relevant in the context of Dara for ME/CFS?
Seems to be the page for the pilot.The study will involve ten patients who will receive the medication over a period of time.
It was showing up as being updated in the last 24 hours so maybe it was just edited.Seems to be the page for the pilot.
The study will involve ten patients who will receive the medication over a period of time.
Is ten patients (same as phase 1) what has been discussed previously for phase 2, or is this new information?It says phase 2
This one is for Trial ID: 2024-512500-19-00, which is the pilot.Is ten patients (fewer than phase 1) what has been discussed previously for phase 2, or is this new information?
They’ve described ResetME as a phase 2/3 trial previously. I don’t think the number matters much. If ResetME is positive, an even larger scale might be warranted to get even more data on who it works for and why.
If I’ve understood things correctly, it’s normal to approve drugs after a positive phase 3. Then you might do an even larger phase 4 to understand even more about the nuances and long term dynamics.Let’s say ResetME is shows Dara works.
At what point would patients be able to access the drug? Would they have to wait for yet another trial?
Or would a future trial be able to happen concurrently to patients getting the drug outside the trial.
At what point would patients be able to access the drug?
Assuming the study is adequately powered, I’d rather have them spend more money on the current participants to work out dosing quirks and doing follow-up in general.Something ive been thinking about - this is listed as a phase 2/3 trial. Do you think F&M might concievably enroll more patients than the planned 66 if they secure enough funding? And if yes, is this something that would be desirable?
I think you're right. And Scheibenbogens CD38 study (ixa something) should provide parallel evidence if that goes ahead.Assuming the study is adequately powered, I’d rather have them spend more money on the current participants to work out dosing quirks and doing follow-up in general.
I suspect the Germans will jump on any opportunity to replicate a -mab study.
Getting something set up to track the use and effect in the general population is also high on my list, if it turns out that Dara works.
Do you mean in people who use it off label for ME if ResetME is successful? I think that would be really important.Getting something set up to track the use and effect in the general population is also high on my list, if it turns out that Dara works.
No, in people that get it through the normal systems once it’s accepted for use. If it’s possible to incorporate data from off label use as well, that might be desirable.Do you mean in people who use it off label for ME if ResetME is successful? I think that would be really important.
It's bizarre to me that they don't see this. Ditto the UK and SequenceMEs potentially.I wish the government and medical research funders would see the PR potential.
Even if it doesn't work, it's still a great story that portrays Norway as a leader in innovation and rigorous science.
If it does, it's a world first. A country whose entire population is less than half that of Los Angeles manages to solve a problem that countries with billions to spend haven't got close to. It'd be a huge coup.
I so agree with you and have thought the same many times. This is very little money to invest compared with how much we could be bragging about it afterwards.I wish the government and medical research funders would see the PR potential.
Even if it doesn't work, it's still a great story that portrays Norway as a leader in innovation and rigorous science.
If it does, it's a world first. A country whose entire population is less than half that of Los Angeles manages to solve a problem that countries with billions to spend haven't got close to. It'd be a huge coup.