Hoopoe
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I feel that this is relevant to discussions about patient beliefs, interoception, illness identity, placebo effects, and attempts to cure patients by manipulating their perception or motivating them to do more. I believe that many healthcare professionals do not understand this topic well.
We know what our limits are by experience. By frequently putting ourselves to the test, we gradually build a mental model of our limits. The mental model is an approximation of reality. Since the illness is often fluctuating and hard to understand, the model is often frustratingly flawed.
A misunderstanding can arise when another person assumes that the patient has constructed a model that has little relation to reality. In this interpretation, the patient merely has to believe that they can do more. And due to the delayed nature of PEM and slowly accumulating PEM this interpretation can appear, at least in some moments and when not observed over longer periods, as having merit.
Someone with a physiology that is able to adapt to increases in activity will tend to assume that the physiology of patients is the same.
If the underlying disease improves, the patient will experience a phase marked by optimism and dismanting of the mental model that is no longer appropriate.
If however, the patient falsely believes that they can do more (due to fluctuations in illness severity, expectations, hopes, manipulation of perception) they can also experience a similar phase, but it won't last. Reality will set in again.
We know what our limits are by experience. By frequently putting ourselves to the test, we gradually build a mental model of our limits. The mental model is an approximation of reality. Since the illness is often fluctuating and hard to understand, the model is often frustratingly flawed.
A misunderstanding can arise when another person assumes that the patient has constructed a model that has little relation to reality. In this interpretation, the patient merely has to believe that they can do more. And due to the delayed nature of PEM and slowly accumulating PEM this interpretation can appear, at least in some moments and when not observed over longer periods, as having merit.
Someone with a physiology that is able to adapt to increases in activity will tend to assume that the physiology of patients is the same.
If the underlying disease improves, the patient will experience a phase marked by optimism and dismanting of the mental model that is no longer appropriate.
If however, the patient falsely believes that they can do more (due to fluctuations in illness severity, expectations, hopes, manipulation of perception) they can also experience a similar phase, but it won't last. Reality will set in again.
Last edited: