I would add a 4th concept: the claims made by the authors are not only unsupported by the data reported in their study, and the other studies they cite, they actively contradict it.
A paper shall pass the test if it has:
- objective outcomes
- at six months or later
- registered in advance
- which are clinically as well as statistically significant
- with <20% cumulative drop outs / lost to follow up at any point
- and which is accurately summarised in the abstract and conclusion
- incorporating rigorous analysis of the direction of causation
- and acknowledgement of potential attrition bias.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.