Dolphin
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
OPEN ACCESS
ORIGINAL REPORTS
October 20, 2026
Results From a Phase II Single-Arm Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Anhydrous Enol-Oxaloacetate on Improving Cognitive Complaints in Breast Cancer Survivors
Authors: Patricia A. Ganz, MD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1841-4143 pganz@mednet.ucla.edu, Kathleen Van Dyk, PhDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1500-930X, Catherine M. Crespi, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6150-2181, Laura Petersen, MS https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4843-2692, Mina S. Sedrak, MD, MS https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8379-391X, and Julienne E. Bower, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0813-4444AUTHORS INFO & AFFILIATIONS
Volume 3, Number 4
DOI: 10.1200/OA-26-00063
426
Metrics
Total Downloads
Abstract
Purpose
Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) affects a substantial proportion of breast cancer survivors (BCSs), yet effective pharmacologic interventions are lacking. Oxaloacetate, a naturally occurring metabolic intermediate with glutamate-scavenging, anti-inflammatory, and mitochondrial bioenergetic properties, was evaluated for its safety and preliminary efficacy in improving cognitive complaints in BCS with moderate to severe CRCI.Methods
We conducted a single-arm, phase II trial enrolling early-stage BCSs who were 12 months to 5 years post–primary treatment and reported significant cognitive complaints on the PROMIS Cognitive Function questionnaire. Participants received oxaloacetate 500 mg orally twice daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was improvement in perceived cognitive impairment, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function Perceived Cognitive Impairment (FACT-Cog PCI) score. Secondary outcomes included fatigue, insomnia, psychological symptoms, physical and mental health–related quality of life, neuropsychological test performance, and safety. Simon's two-stage design with subsequent sequential monitoring was used.Results
Eighteen participants were enrolled; 16 completed the intervention. All evaluable participants demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvement in perceived cognitive impairment (mean FACT-Cog PCI change +26.4 points; P < .0001), with improvement from the impaired to the normative range. Statistically significant improvements were also observed in total fatigue (P < .0001), mental fatigue (P < .0001), and physical function (P = .0003), with a trend toward improvement in insomnia (P = .09). Neuropsychological testing showed improvements in executive function and processing speed. Oxaloacetate was generally well-tolerated; GI symptoms were the most common adverse events, leading to treatment discontinuation in two participants. There were no serious adverse events.Conclusion
Oxaloacetate treatment led to significant improvements in perceived cognitive impairment, fatigue, and physical functioning among BCSs with CRCI, with acceptable tolerability. These findings support further investigation in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to confirm efficacy.Context
Key ObjectiveIs the nutritional supplement anhydrous enol-oxaloacetate effective in reducing symptoms of cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors?
Knowledge Generated
Among 16 of 18 study participants with severe cognitive impairment, the nutritional supplement was well-tolerated and there were statistically significant improvements in self-reported cognition, fatigue, and physical functioning, including significant improvements in neurocognitive test performance over an 8-week period. These findings support further testing of oxaloacetate in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Relevance (M. Lustberg)
Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is common among cancer survivors and currently there are no effective pharmacologic interventions. Oxaloacetate, a naturally occurring metabolic intermediate with glutamate-scavenging, anti-inflammatory, and mitochondrial bioenergetic properties, was evaluated in breast cancer survivors with CRCI and was shown to have evidence of preliminary safety and efficacy. These findings will need to be further evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.*
*Relevance section written by JCO Oncology Advances Associate Editor Maryam B. Lustberg, MD, MPH.