Solve M.E. Patient and Caregiver Resource Guide: Post Exertional Malaise (PEM) and Rest

I appreciate the effort but can't help feeling this is too long,
and several things suggested are not really within the control of many PwME (accessing and preparing healthier foods for example, controlling the temperature and humidity in one's surroundings.... these and other things can cost a lot more money than PwME have and/or have to make compromises with other people who don't have the same requirements).
 
The PEM section
I get the feeling that this was written by someone who doesn't have ME/CFS. It hits a lot of the marks that we would want to see, but it also misses some. Crucially, it seems to focus on fatigue, whereas PEM is much more than that.

See for example this first paragraph in the document. There is mention of a worsening of symptoms, but fatigue is the only symptom mentioned. The immediately following paragraphs don't explain the other symptoms.
As defined by the Centers for Disease Control, “post-exertional malaise (PEM) is the worsening of symptoms following even minor physical or mental exertion, with symptoms typically worsening 12 to 48 hours after activity and lasting for days or even weeks.” PEM is the topic of multiple studies — many of them currently ongoing. Unusual, undeniable, crushing life-altering fatigue. Fatigue that dictates the terms of a person’s lifestyle. Fatigue that demands to be recognized. Fatigue that must be planned for and planned around. It is real and measurable and being aggressively studied in clinical research.
There also seems to be unnecessary redundancy in that paragraph, with two separate phrases talking about PEM being researched.

There's a later paragraph that mentions 'flu-like fatigue' which is closer, but it's still the fatigue that comes with an infection, rather than feeling ill.
With ME/CFS, quick easy recovery cannot be taken for granted. Often crushing fatigue — even after minor everyday exertions — is a major concern for people living through ME/CFS. The kind of fatigue we’re considering is well beyond being reactively tired after vigorous exertion. The kind of fatigue being considered is a relentless flu-like fatigue that can persist for days, even weeks and perhaps months after exertion. These episodes are recently referred to as “crashes.”


I know they are making the good point here that ME/CFS isn't deconditioning. But, ME/CFS isn't necessarily persistent fatigue, as in 'fatigue all the time', and it can involve physical weakness.
Far too often, people who are dealing with ME/CFS are encouraged by well- meaning friends, family, and even doctors to engage in a program of physical exercise. It seems folks unknowingly mistake the uncommon persistent fatigue for physical weakness.

There seems to be some mixing up of PEM with ME/CFS itself.
However, PEM is:
● NOT a condition of being weak or a result of deconditioning
● NOT laziness
● NOT an aversion to exercise


Unless things are very different in the US than here where cheques are a distant memory, I think to talk about balancing a cheque book makes the document seem outdated and hard for most people to relate to.
The mental exertion of reading instructions, studying, reading a good book or balancing a checkbook (or the computerized equivalent), can ignite an unexpected PEM response.


I think this paragraph overstates the impact of worry and stress. I think the effect is to paint us as delicate flowers who can't even manage a contentious political conversation - many of us would enjoy that for a while on a good day. Again PEM seems to be defined as fatigue. Personally, I'm not convinced that a 'common emotionally tense situation' is very different, in terms of its capacity to cause PEM, to a similar situation with the same level of physical and mental exertion, and time spent upright.
Worry and stress, when allowed to gather too much momentum, trigger PEM as well. Sudden fatigue to the point of exhaustion is even more frequent when dealing with common emotionally tense situations; disagreements between family members, financial demands, and a contentious political conversation are all possible scenarios that are likely to produce a “crash.”


There are statements about capabilities that not everyone has. Not everyone can have a shower and re-dress and dry their hair before resting. Never mind 'preparing meals is an ordeal' - not everyone can prepare a meal. It isn't clear what this is doing in the PEM section.
Most people with ME/CFS have learned to plan step-by-step for taking a shower so they can complete a normally simple task with enough energy to re-dress and dry their hair before needing to lie down, or before collapsing on the floor. Some people with ME/CFS report only being able to shower every five days or longer. For people with ME/CFS, preparing meals is an ordeal. This task can also become a major undertaking that must be completed in stages with resting periods between chopping, stirring and cooking.


Thankfully, PEM can be reasonably controlled by “activity management,” also called pacing. Your main goal must be to avoid PEM flare-ups and illness relapses, by balancing your activity and rest.
I think this overstates the control that can be achieved, especially for some people such as the parents of young children, and understates the uncertainty. It's not explained why 'your main goal must be to avoid PEM flareups', or how a PEM flare-up differs from PEM. I would have thought the main goal of a person with ME/CFS, like anyone, is to live a worthwhile and good life. That might mean not avoiding PEM all the time. Especially in the absence of clear evidence, a person with ME/CFS should have the freedom to make that decision without being blamed.


Overall, the section has a lot of repetition, and, I agree, it's much longer than it needs to be to cover the ground it covers. It also starts to discuss rest and pacing, which is what the next section is about. It seems to lack a structure, a clear idea of the points it is trying to get across. I'm sorry to be so negative about this. I agree that there are existing resources that do the job better.
 
The Pacing and Rest section
In common with lots of resources about Pacing, this one misses the important point that a person with ME/CFS has to make hard decisions about how to live their life. Do they stop trying to go to school and study from home? Do they reduce from full time work, to part-time? Work from home? Give up work entirely? Do they need to move back home to be looked after by parents? Do they need to move into a much smaller, easier-care property? Do they have to give up on the idea of having children, at least for now?

Instead, again in common with a lot of resources written by people who don't have ME/CFS, there's a focus on planning and tracking, and chopping tasks up into bits. Which sounds exhausting and a bit soul destroying. Yes, of course there's a place for that, and yes, it should be mentioned. But the key to pacing is changing your life so that the demands normally placed upon you are such that you can handle them with a bit of a buffer for unexpected things.

determine your individual limits for physical and mental activity, and plan your day accordingly. Through trial and error and tracking your symptoms after differing types of activities,
By utilizing personal daily diaries and charting,

The Pacing Tactics section
It's not really clear why this is a different section.

These are good points:
Immediately stop and rest if you start to feel dizzy or short-of-breath, notice your heart rate increasing, or sense other PEM warning signs that might be unique to you. Don’t try to “push through” when you feel sick or tired.
plan extended rest time before and after the event.

I wonder if some of the material could have been delivered in a less didactic tone? I think people want information but scope to make their own mind up on what tradeoffs make life worth living.
Difficult as it may be, avoid the temptation to do too much when you’re feeling a bit better. It is rarely worth the consequences when living with ME/CFS.

There's a great warning that pacing is not GET. But then we are given a relatively large amount of detail about the PACE Trial which seems unnecessary in a Pacing resource. Success has many mothers, or something, and no doubt the CFIDS people did contribute to the recognition of the flaws of the PACE Trial, but now they seem focussed on the selection criteria rather than the more fundamental issue of the unblinded study design with subjective outcomes.
The Solve ME/CFS Initiative (then called The CFIDS Association of America) recognized several flaws in the study, most importantly that study participants might not have even had the disease! Participants only needed to have six months of fatigue, but PEM and other core ME/CFS criteria weren’t even considered. Additionally, the study excluded severely ill patients and anyone who had been living with the illness for more than six years. Despite our analysis, GET became a “go-to” therapy prescribed by doctors for people with ME/CFS.
Since then, patients and advocates have taken up the call to discredit the study.
Regardless, there's too much about the PACE trial and GET.

There's nothing at all about the use of wearable monitoring technology, or apps, which seems like a major omission these days. These can make the whole process of understanding how to operate with ME/CFS much less onerous.

Identifying triggers section
I know people disagree about this, but I'm not very keen on the idea of triggers - I think a bit more of an explanation of an energy budget or something like that would be useful. The energy envelope concept is mentioned in passing but is not explained. The idea of a fluctuating threshold I think is more accurate than the idea of a trigger. Speaking to your aunt on the phone for an hour, for example, isn't a trigger, it's just a cognitively demanding activity that may mean you can't do something else that day in order to avoid PEM.

Diet is important to even the healthiest of bodies, so of course it can make a huge difference in attempting to reinstate health from the effects of this illness.
I don't think there's any evidence that diet cures ME/CFS, which is what 'reinstating health' sounds a lot like.

The next step is to take charge, and move in ways that feel encouraging and supportive to yourself. You can control what you put in your mouth, you can control the type and amount of physical exercise when you are able to tolerate it (slow walking is usually advised), and you can control the temperature and humidity in your daily environment.
There's a table for recording "Types of stress that intensify your symptoms". And a table for recording what foods that affect functioning. I don't think these are a useful use of space.

So, this document seems like something from a long time ago. There are better resources out there. I hope Solve ME has a look at them and has a rethink about their one.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom