@Jonathan Edwards can you tell us how the Q and A session after the film went? Did you get the impression there were MP's interested enough to follow this up with any kind of action?
I'm pond-ering your new avatar @Barry
I could try to pretend there is something deep and mysterious about it, but no. I had a very fraught evening sorting out the avatars bit of the user manual, mistakes compounding mistakes, and I was using my own avatar setting to grab screen shots of. Going through photos, and one I picked seemed interesting - tree roots growing on side of a bank on Dartmoor, but then realised it was much too dark and brooding to put on a help section for PwME. So I went for something more pleasing, and for the moment that's my avatar. It may change in dues courseI'm laking it.
Channeling Monet Barry? I'm going more minimalist than impressionist with my avatar.
@Jonathan Edwards can you tell us how the Q and A session after the film went? Did you get the impression there were MP's interested enough to follow this up with any kind of action?
I tell my students that the traditional response to a pun is a groan. Nice to hear that it still is."Laking it ... ", "pond-ering" - we really do need a groany smily.
I tell my students that the traditional response to a pun is a groan. Nice to hear that it still is.
MPs did not contribute to the discussion directly as far as I know. The MPs present looked as if they were already interested in advocating for more research for ME but I do not think any specific opportunities were identified. I don't think anyone was expecting that.
@Jonathan Edwards
Was there any specific feedback from the MPs?
We're planning a screening for Parliamentarians in Canada and that kind of info might be helpful.
Thanks.
Please keep us all posted on this. Nothing much is happening in Canada on this front.
Please keep us all posted on this. Nothing much is happening in Canada on this front.
There was no slot for any feedback. I think that was right. Lady Mar and Charles and Jen and Jessica put their story to the representatives of the people. It would have been crass to ask for a response. I think everyone was grateful that MPs came and sat right through and several made it clear they were supportive. It was a way to build and cement friendships. MPs after all are not the legislature. They are there to be our advocates when the legislature chooses to act. I think it is good that this process is kept separate from lobbying government as such. That has been done as well, but the rules of engagement are different.
Are you aware of this plan to show Unrest at the Canadian parliament?
https://www.s4me.info/index.php?thr...-film-to-canadian-parliament-help-wanted.433/
@brf![]()
@Jonathan Edwards said on that other thread that Charles Shepherd would be a good person to ask for advice (the medical adviser for the UK's ME Association).
Was there any specific feedback from the MPs?
Just read somewhere that the MPs only saw a preview of Unrest...? Anyone know, did they watch the whole film?
Just read somewhere that the MPs only saw a preview of Unrest...? Anyone know, did they watch the whole film?
http://www.meaction.net/2017/11/01/what-did-the-parliamentary-unrest-event-achieve/Despite knowing the issues facing people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) should concern MP’s from across the political divide, it has been hard work to engage them to our cause. The APPG (All Party Parliamentary Group) for ME was disbanded in June this year and we needed new ways to recruit much needed support for the ME community.
When the ME Association secured the Speaker’s State Rooms for a special parliamentary screening of the film, Unrest, it had the potential to be a game changer.
The timing of the event couldn’t have been better. When NICE declared that it was proposing NOT to update their guideline for ME (CG53) last summer, it provided the whole community with an excellent campaigning opportunity.