Adam pwme
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Auto-transcript part 1:
Thanks Esther what software did you use?
Auto-transcript part 1:
In criticising membership of support groups Sharpe mentions that those who are members are likely to be those who have been sick for longer & therefore more pessimistic. This then begs the question if someone has recovered from covid would they not move on, as Sharpe himself suggests? Why would they join a group for people who haven't recovered? Using Sharpe's own logic the only people who would join a support group are those who haven't recovered.
Thanks Esther what software did you use?
I've struggled to find a good free program so currently upload stuff to youtube, mark the videos as private and then use their automatically generated subtitles. Anyone have a better approach than this?
your subs seem better than mine.
It's unlikely that there is a free software that can do this better than Google. Maybe easier but definitely not better.I've struggled to find a good free program so currently upload stuff to youtube, mark the videos as private and then use their automatically generated subtitles. Anyone have a better approach than this?
George Monbiot, "Turns out I'm a Long Covid super-spreader. We seem to have returned to the age when we believed diseases are spread by spells and incantations."In a remarkable display of—well, I’m not even sure what to call it–Professor Michael Sharpe has blamed Guardian columnist George Monbiot and Long COVID support groups, among others, for the wave of people reporting prolonged symptoms after acute bouts of COVID-19. And during the same February presentation in which he made those observations, Professor Sharpe warned viewers of “poor quality research” while still citing his beloved but discredited PACE trial as if it offered meaningful evidence. The event was an “Expert Forum on secondary COVID-19 impacts” organized by Swiss Re, a major reinsurance company.
https://www.virology.ws/2021/04/06/...ing-long-covid-says-professor-michael-sharpe/
In a remarkable display of—I’m not even sure what to call it
A tweet by Tuller:In a remarkable display of—well, I’m not even sure what to call it–Professor Michael Sharpe has blamed Guardian columnist George Monbiot and Long COVID support groups, among others, for the wave of people reporting prolonged symptoms after acute bouts of COVID-19. And during the same February presentation in which he made those observations, Professor Sharpe warned viewers of “poor quality research” while still citing his beloved but discredited PACE trial as if it offered meaningful evidence. The event was an “Expert Forum on secondary COVID-19 impacts” organized by Swiss Re, a major reinsurance company.
https://www.virology.ws/2021/04/06/...ing-long-covid-says-professor-michael-sharpe/
A tweet by Tuller:
Wow, Professor Michael Sharpe, who blames Guardian columnist @GeorgeMonbiot for causing Long Covid, posted this comment under my blog about it: "I do believe the word ‘hysterical’ is Dr Tuller." Professor Sharpe, can you translate that into English, please?
A tweet by Tuller:
Wow, Professor Michael Sharpe, who blames Guardian columnist @GeorgeMonbiot for causing Long Covid, posted this comment under my blog about it: "I do believe the word ‘hysterical’ is Dr Tuller." Professor Sharpe, can you translate that into English, please?
Tuller said:Here’s what seems to be Professor Sharpe’s basic point: We wouldn’t be hearing from all these anxiety-ridden, depressed, hysterical and deluded people (mostly women) if they weren’t being convinced that there’s a thing called Long COVID by patient disinformation and fearmongers like George Monbiot.
That’s the argument. That’s it. Really.