The body and the brain keep the score: a data-driven conceptual model linking trauma and postural tachycardia syndrome, 2026, Crouch et al

voner

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
The body and the brain keep the score: a data-driven conceptual model linking trauma and postural tachycardia syndrome

Crouch, Taylor B.; Chelimsky, Gisela; Boylan, Laura; Maxwell, Madison; Westcott, Grace; Chase, Spencer Owen; Redman, Tammy; Burch, James; Gharbo, Raouf; Wells, Mary; Redemer, Whitney; Kinser, Patricia; Chelimsky, Thomas

Abstract
Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a common, often disabling disorder of autonomic nervous system regulation without a unifying etiological account. Converging evidence suggests infectious, physical, and emotional threats frequently precede onset.

We propose a hypothesis-generating model in which POTS may, in some individuals, involve threat-induced, centrally maintained disruption of brain–body communication that may be responsive to neuroplasticity-based behavioral medicine. In this paper, we synthesized multidisciplinary literature and our team’s data spanning (a) autonomic and central nervous system responses to threat and trauma, (b) neurological alterations associated with early life stress, (c) links between adverse childhood experiences and posttraumatic stress disorder with autonomic symptom burden, and (d) clinical developments targeting the threat system and autonomic regulation. These data suggest that chronic or overwhelming threat exposure is associated with sympathetic activation, reduced vagal tone, and neuroplastic alterations within cortico-limbic and brainstem networks that parallel POTS features (exaggerated tachycardia, autonomic rigidity, multisystem dysregulation).

Preliminary data indicate individuals with higher trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms report greater autonomic symptom severity and poorer global health. Emerging imaging suggests a potentially important role for the periaqueductal gray (PAG), a midbrain hub for autonomic, cardiovascular, motor, and pain responses to threat, which may fail to reset after trauma, leaving the ANS in a sustained escape-mode (fight/flight/freeze) that increases POTS risk. Overall, these findings provide preliminary conceptual support for a unified hypothesis linking trauma, PAG-mediated threat responses, and sustained autonomic dysregulation in POTS, underscoring the importance of trauma-informed care.

Behavioral interventions that target threat reduction and autonomic regulation such as rate variability biofeedback and neuroplasticity-oriented psychotherapies, may complement standard medical care. Prospective, longitudinal studies are needed to clarify causal pathways and identify responsive subgroups, and randomized clinical trials are required to establish the efficacy of nervous system-focused behavioral interventions.

Web | DOI | PMC | PDF | Frontiers in Psychology

(edited to break up the abstract into easier to read text blocks.)
 
Reminds me of the book The Body Does Not Keep The Score by professor Scheeringa:
 
I think the topic itself is quite interesting as there is research on early-life stress, for instance, alterimg the HPA axis in the long run causing an imbalance between brain mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors. The conclusion in the abstract is pure cringe though.
 
Same old stuff, completely unfalsifiable, burden of proof becomes on the patient to prove otherwise, no explanation and no amount of evidence otherwise will be accepted. There is absolutely no basis to all this "threat" and "fear" nonsense, it's pure assertively speculated bigotry that makes a mockery of the process and aims of science.

The fact that they can go on pretending like this is new when they know very well this is just the same old repackaged nonsense should tell them everything they need to know about how it's a bunch of poorly fabricated horseshit.

The amount of lying and complete bullshit fabrication that goes on in this profession has become offensive all by itself, even ignoring its horrifying consequences. No system can function with this much dishonesty.
 
It is the same old story. Claiming that the normal rules of physiology explain disease. They don't, they explain normality. An explanation of disease requires a specific theory about why these rules no longer apply in a very small number of people. Trauma is everywhere. Disease is not.
I feel this needs to be committed to a cross stitch, I’ll let you know how it goes.
 
If trauma really was that powerful the human race would not have survived for as long as it has (approx. 250 000 years), and through the often extreme troubles it has.
Yeah it’s only the defective type A perfectionists who do too much and also too little who can’t deal with the trauma properly.
I hear they have become stuck in a brain loop…obviously normal people who have trauma deal with it normally, by going for a run.
 
Back
Top Bottom