The epithelial barrier hypothesis proposes a comprehensive understanding of the origins of allergic and other chronic noncommunicable diseases 2022,

Sly Saint

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Cezmi A. Akdis

A steep increase in the prevalence of many chronic noncommunicable diseases occurred during the last 60 years, bringing them to a pandemic size.1 Our research and efforts to explain the reasons for this rise in their prevalence helped to develop the epithelial barrier hypothesis.

This hypothesis posits that disturbance of the epithelial barriers by laundry and dishwasher detergents, household cleaners, surfactants, enzymes and emulsifiers used in the food industry, cigarette smoke, particulate matter, diesel exhaust, ozone, nanoparticles, and microplastics cause tissue inflammation and microbial dysbiosis and play a role in many chronic noncommunicable diseases.1

The “epithelial barrier hypothesis” proposes mechanisms for the development of diseases of allergic, autoimmune, and neurodegenerative nature, with inflammation and tissue damage in the directly affected organs or distant organs that are not located directly at the skin and mucosal surfaces; accepts and embraces the hygiene and biodiversity hypotheses and links them to epithelial barrier defects and microbial dysbiosis; demonstrates possible ways of prevention of allergic and autoimmune diseases; and suggests future research directions.1

There is a need to support science and advance the understanding of the factors and molecular mechanisms associated with leaky epithelial barriers and inform policymakers of the detrimental effects of the potential causal or contributing substances. Here, I summarize the molecular and cellular mechanisms of the “epithelial barrier hypothesis” and supporting evidence.

 
A steep increase in the prevalence of many chronic noncommunicable diseases occurred during the last 60 years, bringing them to a pandemic size.
Is that actually true, or is it just society's recognition of those as actual diseases rather than just "complaints". I assume that the number of official diagnoses of ADHD steeply rose after that term was coined, but that doesn't mean that the number of people who had attention problems rose faster than general population growth.

Micro/nanoparticles of synthetic products gets news coverage, as do new noxious chemicals, but the natural world has been producing micro/nanoparticles since it formed. Do dust mites and houseflies not produce nanoparticles? Do plants and fungi not produce new noxious chemicals during their ongoing battle against attackers? I'm certainly not saying that none of the products developed in the last 60 years might be causing new health problems, but humans evolved dealing with new chemicals and particles, although at a much slower rate than today.
 
Is that actually true

Not that I am aware of.
Actually it is quite obviously the opposite since people are living much longer.
When I trained as a doctor I was responsible for about 50 people in bed dying of chronic non-communicable disease. Many were in their fifties. By the time I left medicine everyone was six inches taller, lived 10 years longer and by and large stayed fit and well until old age.
 
Is that actually true, or is it just society's recognition of those as actual diseases rather than just "complaints". I assume that the number of official diagnoses of ADHD steeply rose after that term was coined, but that doesn't mean that the number of people who had attention problems rose faster than general population growth.

Micro/nanoparticles of synthetic products gets news coverage, as do new noxious chemicals, but the natural world has been producing micro/nanoparticles since it formed. Do dust mites and houseflies not produce nanoparticles? Do plants and fungi not produce new noxious chemicals during their ongoing battle against attackers? I'm certainly not saying that none of the products developed in the last 60 years might be causing new health problems, but humans evolved dealing with new chemicals and particles, although at a much slower rate than today.

I can't find data going back 60 years, but here's some data from the 2000's.


 
Not that I am aware of.
Actually it is quite obviously the opposite since people are living much longer.
When I trained as a doctor I was responsible for about 50 people in bed dying of chronic non-communicable disease. Many were in their fifties. By the time I left medicine everyone was six inches taller, lived 10 years longer and by and large stayed fit and well until old age.
With us, you reconnect with the tender days of your youth as a doctor. The circle is complete.
 
Back
Top Bottom