My opinion is that if the acronym ME/CFS is going to be used, which I personally favour, then it should be written as,ME/CFS
Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), sometimes referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a serious and long-term illness.
I haven't looked, but does MEpedia state what naming conventions they use?
If I recall correctly this is taken from the wikipedia page. I would personally put the PEM sentence in second place, to give more emphasis, and even consider bolding the ~pem is a hallmark symptom~ part, given how often PEM is ignored in news articles.Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), sometimes referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a serious and long-term illness. People with ME/CFS experience debilitating fatigue, non-refreshing sleep, and problems with memory or concentration. Other common symptoms include pain, gut issues, sensitivity to light and sound, and orthostatic intolerance (dizziness or nausea when upright). The hallmark symptom of ME/CFS is a marked worsening of the illness after exertion, often referred to as post-exertional malaise (PEM).
We have separate pages for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, ME/CFS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome as well as SEID. The convention is that the terminology used in an ME-pedia article should match the terminology used in the underlying source. Where there is a tension between the term used in the source and the definition (e.g., ME defined by the Oxford criteria or ME/CFS defined by the Canadian Consensus Criteria), it may be useful for clarity to mention the definition used.
there is a typo where it says it effects just 2 european citizens .All sound good to me. Depends a bit on the other MEpedia editors: will they revert big changes for example if we replace the current with the draft I posted above?
I really like that. How should we do this. Do you want to directly overhaul the article with your draft, or should we maybe make an “invite only” google docs where people can make edits and comment, improving it until there is consensus to replace the original me-pedia page.
Maybe we could even create a page in the draft namespace of me-pedia? So everyone can edit via me-pedia, and replace the original page when there is consensus.
I looked and unlike wikipedia, me-pedia doesn’t seem to have a draft namespace…I think the Draft option is best. Maybe a note at the top of the real one that a new version is being worked on, with a link to it.
I looked and unlike wikipedia, me-pedia doesn’t seem to have a draft namespace…
Actually, maybe don't make a Draft page. It looks like regular users can't delete pages, so after the draft is done, there will be an extra draft page in the Main namespace floating around for who knows how long, showing up in places like stats and Random page.I looked and unlike wikipedia, me-pedia doesn’t seem to have a draft namespace…
Well I uhm just created it like literally a minute ago lmaoActually, maybe don't make a Draft page. It looks like regular users can't delete pages, so after the draft is done, there will be an extra draft page in the Main namespace floating around for who knows how long, showing up in places like stats and Random page
Well I uhm just created it like literally a minute ago lmao
Thanks I'll try to add some references and improve the text if energy permits.I pasted @ME/CFS Skeptic ’s draft into it but otherwise it is pretty much blank.
Is it my computer/internet or is MEpedia really slow to load?
Well I uhm just created it like literally a minute ago lmao
It's too buggy for me. Had multiple times where it crashed when I tried to save changes. It's also so slow that editing takes 5-10x more time to do than in other programs.It's often really slow for me on phone and computer, wifi and cellular