This is a pretty good summary of the crippling loss of ambition in the industry. It's far preferable to commit to perpetual failure, lacking any and all ambition whatsoever, than to try anything that might work. It encourages ambiguous definitions with loosely stated goals that can only be assessed in the form of opinions. The industry exists for itself, is no longer concerned with its own output, or rather its output is now its own continuation in its present state. A perpetual failure reactionary machine.That is why an entire industry dedicated to writing grant applications has sprung up in the EU. External firms are often hired for this purpose. Applications are written to maximize the use of keywords that appear in the requirements and that reviewers pay attention to (and they do pay attention to them to ensure maximum objectivity and avoid being accused of bias). Project ideas are crafted when new calls for proposals open. Consortia are assembled on a turnkey basis. First, promises are made; then, only once funding is awarded, people figure out how to deliver on them. And they promise a great deal.
Unfortunately, very few interesting, well-thought-out initiatives can hold their own in the battle of proposals.
As a result, many projects funded by EU programs yield relatively mediocre results. They’re carried out in such a way as to present the promised deliverables regardless of their quality (since that’s hard to assess).
Meanwhile literally 100% of medicine's achievements have come out of biomedical research, but it's falling out of favor faster than pumpkin sales in November. It's emblematic of our current era, but damn is it still one of the weirdest things happening in the world right now. It's like this industry has turned self-cannibalistic, it feasts on itself to continue its existence feasting on itself.

