Jonathan Edwards
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-sleeping-beauties-by-suzanne-o-sullivan-review-29kq7wdtb
Interesting article by Whipple on a book by Suzanne Sullivan.
Essentially Whipple accepts Sullivan's claim that there are illnesses due to the idea of having the illness. The clearest example is asylum seeking girls in Sweden who develop 'sleeping beauty' illness specific to asylum seekers in Sweden. I think this is fair. There must be illnesses like this based on suggestion.
However, Whipple has a sting in his tail. He wonders if these disease are spread by giving diagnoses then maybe they will be spread further by the book. He concludes that if anything in the book makes sense in terms of treatment it is seeing a shaman in the Caribbean.
I am not sure that most readers will quite get what Whipple is saying. I also think that Whipple does not make it clear enough that the problem with Sullivan is that she wants to extend her analysis of these illnesses of suggestion widely to all sorts of other illnesses. Nor that the pseudo-epileptic illness in the Caribbean probably has a very different basis from the asylum seeker illness and that there is no one explanation that can be used as a general theory.
But maybe Whipple has picked out the things that matter. And particularly the irony that it may be people like Sullivan and Stone and co who are actually driving these illnesses as much as anyone.
Interesting article by Whipple on a book by Suzanne Sullivan.
Essentially Whipple accepts Sullivan's claim that there are illnesses due to the idea of having the illness. The clearest example is asylum seeking girls in Sweden who develop 'sleeping beauty' illness specific to asylum seekers in Sweden. I think this is fair. There must be illnesses like this based on suggestion.
However, Whipple has a sting in his tail. He wonders if these disease are spread by giving diagnoses then maybe they will be spread further by the book. He concludes that if anything in the book makes sense in terms of treatment it is seeing a shaman in the Caribbean.
I am not sure that most readers will quite get what Whipple is saying. I also think that Whipple does not make it clear enough that the problem with Sullivan is that she wants to extend her analysis of these illnesses of suggestion widely to all sorts of other illnesses. Nor that the pseudo-epileptic illness in the Caribbean probably has a very different basis from the asylum seeker illness and that there is no one explanation that can be used as a general theory.
But maybe Whipple has picked out the things that matter. And particularly the irony that it may be people like Sullivan and Stone and co who are actually driving these illnesses as much as anyone.
Last edited by a moderator: