United Kingdom 2024: Online workshops on ME/CFS Research

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research news' started by Andy, Apr 18, 2024.

Tags:
  1. MEMarge

    MEMarge Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,874
    Location:
    UK
    Tempting, but probably not productive...
     
    hotblack, Ash, Missense and 8 others like this.
  2. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    54,644
    Location:
    UK
    I have signed up to attend. If I manage to work the technology, I intend to watch and listen to some of it, but not try to take notes or ask questions
     
    hotblack, Ash, Hutan and 9 others like this.
  3. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    14,509
    Location:
    London, UK
    Trojan might be the word.
     
    hotblack, Fainbrog, Missense and 6 others like this.
  4. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    54,644
    Location:
    UK
    I have watched the first 2 talks.
    Sarah Tyson's section on her team's development of PROMs she said she expects the 3 tested so far on symptoms, PEM and function are expected to be useful for clinical trials. She talked a bit about them in general terms about reliability and validity and the need to take onto account that ME is a fluctuating condition, so quite large changes would be needed to show clinical change.
    Then physiological measures 2 day CPET - she said "drop in aerobic threshold on the second day equals onset of PEM". She said a bit about the home testing study led by Nicola Clague Baker that found physiological effects of activities in the pwME but not consistent between individuals.
    Then wearables which she talked about briefly and very dismissively as unreliable and not validated for ME.

    There was a question about FUNCAP which she said is validated, but she is clearly not keen on. She says she found it difficult to fill in and she thinks her team's approach to a function questionnaire is better. She describes the difference as FUNCAP focuses on the consequences of doing activities, whereas her questionnaire focuses on the adaptations people make to decide to do or not do each activity.
     
    hotblack, Ash, Hutan and 12 others like this.
  5. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    54,644
    Location:
    UK
    I watched Caroline Kingdon who talked about her experience of visiting people at home who are participating in the ME Biobank. She was excellent on the need for the clinician to listen and be adaptable to the pwME's needs and limitations when designing and carrying out research. Very good talk.

    Ran out of energy to watch the last 2 talks.
     
    hotblack, Ash, Hutan and 12 others like this.
  6. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    14,351
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    FUNCAP is Not difficult to fill in it is being used by thousands of people in visible through the app monthly. The view of one person is not a valid basis for ruling something out for potential use in the NHS, inappropriate. A lot of people with ME rely on technology more than the average person. It’s a pity ME Association didn’t link up with the Visible team instead.
     
    Kiristar, hotblack, Ash and 15 others like this.
  7. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    946
    I thought she’d said here PROMS was NOT to be used for clinical trials

    I guess if she found FUNCAP difficult to fill in, she’s speaking on badly of the ME community now?
     
    hotblack, Hutan, bobbler and 5 others like this.
  8. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    14,509
    Location:
    London, UK
    I have huge respect for Caroline. She just talks sense and never oversteps her evidence base.

    I couldn't muster the energy to listen to the rest.
     
    Kiristar, hotblack, Ash and 12 others like this.
  9. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,789
    Location:
    Australia
    Then wearables which she talked about briefly and very dismissively as unreliable and not validated for ME.

    Well then the profession needs get to making them reliable and validated. Because inadequately controlled PROMS are not okay.
     
    hotblack, Ash, Hutan and 10 others like this.
  10. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    14,509
    Location:
    London, UK
    I actually thought there was a recent paper showing that wearables worked fine in showing that people with ME/CFS do much less.
     
    Kiristar, hotblack, Ash and 11 others like this.
  11. FMMM1

    FMMM1 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,812
    Yip, brief look online years ago indicated that the (much poorer/early) wearable were better at assessing activity versus subjective "user reported" - how can we be having this debate (Sarah Tyson)?
     
    hotblack, Ash, MEMarge and 9 others like this.
  12. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    946
    It’s just an excuse. They’re doing the thing they want to do. They want to do PROMS with paper questionnaires they way they want to, that’s all.
     
    hotblack, Ash, MEMarge and 8 others like this.
  13. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,652
    Given that the patient participation seems backwards engineered , I suspect the bulk of this was done years ago before wearables became more of a thing and it's sat on shelf awaiting funding.
    The language and methodology seem pre revised NICE guidelines, but too much sunk cost to change..
     
    hotblack, Ash, MEMarge and 9 others like this.
  14. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    54,644
    Location:
    UK
    By email from the workshop organiser Monica Bolton:

    Dear attendee,


    Many thanks for attending the Clinical Trial Design in People with ME/CFS workshop and we hope that you found it informative.

    We said at the workshop that we would make as much of it available as possible.

    The link for the workshop material is here:

    Clinical Trials Workshop

    The folder contains two sub-folders labelled;-

    Agenda and Presentations. All these are Microsoft documents, and if you click on any document you will be asked to log into Microsoft. Most people will find it easiest to download each document/power point presentation (right click on the document) and then open on your own machine with your Microsoft or equivalent software.

    and

    Workshop files. The workshop files includes the video file of the workshop, the vtt file (which adds the closed captions), the audio only file, the chat files and the closed caption text file. We hope to edit the closed caption text file if we have time as one of the speakers had microphone issues. So please check back later, probably over the summer, if you want a clearer version.

    We hope to keep this link available for some time. Please feel free to download the files and to distribute the link to anyone you feel may be interested in the workshop.

    If you have comments or questions please contact us on

    clinical-trial-design@serafina3.me.uk

    Yours,

    Monica Bolton & Alan Mould
     
    bobbler, hotblack, Missense and 5 others like this.
  15. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    54,644
    Location:
    UK
    Well that was useful (not)
    I tried to open one of the documents and got an access denied response.
     
    Ash, Missense, Sean and 5 others like this.
  16. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,585
    I too couldn’t access files but video recording worked.
     
    Ash, Missense, Hutan and 3 others like this.
  17. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    946
    I’ve accessed and downloaded the closed caps document.

    Here are photos of Tysons talk
    I only skimmed it
    the PROMS data can be used for clinical research
    Attendees were commenting how unreliable they find wearables
    IMG_2720.png IMG_2719.png IMG_2718.png IMG_2717.png
     
    hotblack, Ash, Missense and 3 others like this.
  18. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    54,644
    Location:
    UK
    That was Sarah Tyson as part of her talk commenting about how unreliable some individuals find wearables, presumably from a few people she's spoken to. I don't recall the audience making any such comments. Can you point to it?
     
    hotblack, Ash, Missense and 3 others like this.
  19. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    946
    IMG_2720.jpeg
    a lot of comments in the chat about wearables being incredibly unreliable and not recording
     
    hotblack, Ash, MEMarge and 4 others like this.
  20. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    946
    The issues with wearables seems to be that because they’re all different in how they measure, and she doesn’t know the “under the hood” calculations they use etc, they’re not reliable and -this is key- therefore those results wouldn’t be fit to use as clinical trial data.

    Generating a data set for clinical trial data was the NICE gap this project was to fill, was then not part of this project, then suggested it could be a secondary benefit, I don’t like the way this is inconsistent. Also it will be GiGO data, rubbish in rubbish out. I don’t care for any “clinical trial” using this data as a measure
     
    hotblack, MEMarge, Missense and 5 others like this.

Share This Page