"Yoga, Depression, & Clinical Trial Critique 101" by Hilda Bastian

Discussion in 'Research methodology news and research' started by Tom Kindlon, Aug 14, 2018.

  1. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,254
    Esther12, Snow Leopard, Joh and 16 others like this.
  2. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,769
    Brilliant article. Makes things easy to understand.
    Something like this should be on every undergraduate course .
     
    Esther12, Inara, Barry and 2 others like this.
  3. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,924
    Location:
    UK
    "It’s even risky to rely on what the authors of a trial say previous research has shown – they may not have done enough research to know, or they may be quoting studies selectively. Even when they quote a systematic review of the literature, it could be out of date, or not be thorough itself."

    see also Cochrane assessing risk of bias tool

    "It is important to assess risk of bias in all studies in a review irrespective of the anticipated variability in either the results or the validity of the included studies.

    For instance, the results may be consistent among studies but all the studies may be flawed. In this case, the review’s conclusions should not be as strong as if a series of rigorous studies yielded consistent results about an intervention’s effect.

    In a Cochrane review, this appraisal process is described as the assessment of risk of bias in included studies."

    https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/a...cluded-studies#The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool
     
    Esther12, Snow Leopard, sb4 and 7 others like this.

Share This Page