I'm not so sure, suspect we're almost at the point where AI (the top models like Claude Fable or GPT-6-Astra) is better and faster at coding than almost all human coders. I don't have a coding background though, so perhaps others can provide more insight.
It seems to have already have made an...
Feel free to share more insight from the mathematics community because it feels like insight/warning about what's going to happen in many other fields. The coding community is similarly affected but it has many people wanting to hype AI because of commercial interests, so I feel like the...
I suspect they use multiple LLM AI agents when working on such complex problems, with some AIs coordinating tasks and others trying out different options and possibilities.
So in a sense it doesn't matter that some AI answers are really stupid, they are probably reviewed by other AI bots and...
I did an attempt at doing a colocalization analysis between this fibromyalgia GWAS and DecodeME.
Took significant hits from both GWAS and then checked if the other had a similar signal. This is done using the coloc package in R which assumes only 1 causal SNP. The downside is that this often...
Found some more support for this in this preprint (Ji et al. 2025)
Benchmarking genome-wide association study causal gene prioritization for drug discovery
They looked at genetic evidence leading to successful drug development. Distance (the nearest gene method) did equally well compared to...
They are in large part determined by distance but the folding can change that distance. We have looked at tools like H-MAGMA that try to incorporate that.
A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain-disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles |...
Can only add that this paper (like their previous one) raises all sorts of red flags for me. There's a lot of (justified) enthusiasm for genetic findings in ME/CFS but this isn't line of research isn't part of it.
The media attention is mostly driven by commercial interests, rather than the...
Looks like the VADYS-ME study found something similar:
https://s4me.info/threads/investigations-of-vascular-dysfunction-and-hypoperfusion-in-patients-diagnosed-with-me-cfs-vadys-me-2027-d%C3%B6hner-et-al.51494/post-716581
I wrote a brief blog article on the buspirone findings to help highlight the findings. It links to this S4ME discussion and the excellent overview by forestglip.
https://mecfsscience.org/increased-prolactin-response-to-buspirone/
Excellent work!
The group tags probably aren't that important. The main thing to note is that several studies were students from working under Behan as your review already does.
I calculated an effect size (Hedges g) using the data in the thesis.
Males
Using prolactin values after 1 hour
-1.38 [-2.42, -0.30]
Using prolactin difference between baseline and 1 hour
- 1.45 [-2.51, -0.36]
Females
Using prolactin values after 1 hour
-1.71 [-2.96, -0.40]
Using prolactin...
Yes that might be the more conservative option. The plot does show 15-minute intervals before the administration of buspirone. And as ScoutB says, the growth hormone plot also shows the same intervals up unto 240 so perhaps it's simply a bad description in the methods section.
I've been extracting the data from the graphs in the buspirone studies, it looks something like this. For Bakheit 1992 I took males only, Sharpe 1996 is also males only, the other studies have both sexes combined.
EDIT: there might be an error in the Sharpe 1996 original data plot, see the...
I think the Sharpe 1996 (Cowen group) study had a pretty good view on the problem saying it was likely the dopamine instead of serotonin pathway that was abnormal. They wrote:
Increased prolactin response to buspirone in chronic fatigue syndrome - PubMed
My guess is that buspirone was seen as...
I have the CIBA symposium book from 1993 but it doesn't have much discussion on the buspirone tests. Doesn't work to upload the doc but here are some screenshot of the places where buspirone or prolactin is mentioned, the discussion moves to other topic afterwards.
First section:
Then a bit...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.