Search results

  1. Cheshire

    Who Reviews ME/CFS Applications for NIH? Jennie Spotila

    Read more
  2. Cheshire

    Open letter to the Trustees and Staff of Action for ME about the 'Toolkit for professionals'

    Posts discussing IAFME, Forward ME and the roles and relationships of ME organisations have been moved to this thread.
  3. Cheshire

    United Kingdom: BACME Guidelines for Severe ME, 2019 and 2024 update

    No, this is not in the new guidelines, but is in the section 'what is ME and CFS' of the Sussex & Kent ME/CFS Society website.
  4. Cheshire

    United Kingdom: BACME Guidelines for Severe ME, 2019 and 2024 update

    Considering who the MEASussex is collaborating with, there are reasons to be concerned: https://measussex.org.uk/what-is-me-or-cfs/
  5. Cheshire

    UK Parliamentary debate today - Thursday 24th January 2019

    Besides all the limitations such a debate inherently has, "the discredited PACE trial" was a blatancy for everyone. Who would have bet that with certainty a few years ago?
  6. Cheshire

    UK Parliamentary debate today - Thursday 24th January 2019

    Sorry, because I didn't get everything, what was put to vote exactly?
  7. Cheshire

    UK Parliamentary debate today - Thursday 24th January 2019

    At the beginning, some said it was a non partisan question, and all interventions are heading in the same way.
  8. Cheshire

    Petition against National Competence center for CFS/ME with BPS approach in Norway - anyone can sign

    Wow, apart from the fact that this is pure speculation, this is hateful. In the real world like in all those service evaluations that barely show any improvment? This is very embarrassing. Such blatant anger against patients from "carers", disturbing really.
  9. Cheshire

    Treating medically unexplained physical symptoms: Effective interventions are available (1997) Sharpe & Mayou

    They even seem to admit it: This is insane. "We give you a diagnosis, whatever that means."
  10. Cheshire

    Carol Monaghan granted a Backbench debate (UK Parliament) Thursday 24th January 2019

    @dave30th's post on the debate: Trial By Error: Carol Monaghan Scores Another Parliamentary Debate Edit: dedicated thread there.
  11. Cheshire

    The $35 billion race to cure a silent killer that affects 30 million Americans

    I think everybody agrees with the fact that obesity rates would decrease if people ate more healthily. That is obvious. But major lifestyle changes are not easy for many complex reasons (if it were, there would be no problem anymore). Saying to obese people "just change your lifestyle" is akin...
  12. Cheshire

    Carol Monaghan has applied for a debate in UK House of Commons main chamber

    Posts relating to the Backbench debate (UK Parliament) Thursday 24th January 2019 granted to Carol Monaghan have been moved to a new thread.
  13. Cheshire

    The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use (2019) Orben et al.

    The phenomenon of an older generation complaining about the following one goes back to Antiquity: http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20171003-proof-that-people-have-always-complained-about-young-adults
  14. Cheshire

    The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use (2019) Orben et al.

    Article in the Independent: Screen time no more harmful to teenage mental health than eating potatoes, study shows https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/screen-time-mental-health-wellbeing-vegetables-potatoes-science-health-oxford-university-a8727691.html
  15. Cheshire

    Blog: Changing the narrative #1: exploring a new approach to strategic communications in the ME community, by Valerie Eliot Smith

    Even though we're not in a position of power, I think the situation is no longer as dire as she describes. This was true two or three years ago, but less so now. Edit: crosspost with @JohnTheJack Not sure there is such a thing as an "ME community", just sick and disorganised patients that are...
  16. Cheshire

    The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use (2019) Orben et al.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0506-1 This twitter thread explains how data have been distorted to fit the preconceived views of the authors of the primary studies: A few tweets:
  17. Cheshire

    Open letter to the Trustees and Staff of Action for ME about the 'Toolkit for professionals'

    I am always bemused by how low AfME's standards are. Unbelievable. Great letter, @Trish
Back
Top Bottom